Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp255308imw; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:48:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vza39k0lBPJzVOrek9bAJoPUvLqJDiKpXVlj29YE5yO0z9/KeF31iNBkKYyANinSxIwBb3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4a88:b0:1ef:e6a1:f2e5 with SMTP id lp8-20020a17090b4a8800b001efe6a1f2e5mr8569786pjb.1.1657784881705; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:48:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657784881; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y920sZlgHGkiySxSJnVZochYXX+Febx3IXEBaeC9n18ewNcYHnqTvpBIc00qhJASGX KdmTkWLC/90sgEPmeA3dtRJxw1QvIO19Z9cWXfJjsgQF2ridYbh8KqrOHBXkdHXIVTyy DORbocOGVO8kW+LkBtU04OyybgXWDsGoUFMbqDBuU2fF8AsfrYA9Nk0hrwzuns2PSBIX McFwV8zWVGLvxkch21Z4Q5MBM9NddTFbsuDXyZdPEdotdFy5cOHrkvQWeaQKHxPj13fH hlxtftvNQ8sadTt/ScPvcFIYF7P2mt2/tD70tE7Ak5KAyRxhgritvGQ4Bp3y8qdwfyrJ VeZQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=uGTKzeprnwSXnbqHhlClhWNOVWDQWwVH82y8HTb0lvE=; b=jV5EfDpJhp1Q9YwH7A+ivOnAfC8f0F3q5DgYClv9NTiL9sAbRDfc1LRu+HhRVw0+VL Zcp3FXkPapHOnwHLtWSJaZQCbKjvt0tNTpmFL6vRRXaG3vjYmuHW10CSdiijrlLb585O 0pxY/E4NQeZdwWwUUnhd0gvTeAM+pGjXJXdxCg5ioDLG1TFzUxrKX/8hllhsrHCR7ekN OwF2tH995/WVuoJHOdFT86ahtNVhfOSDbmobvKNRQrAQcMp5TUZU4Vgl6miKUGQopKVR rdBuk1tk0BzAw/e0zUpBkkF4P8yTJGdSXaAqry+05kaEd18TaXHlYQuTtHX6g9z6Zo09 1rOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=cgUr0qoP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id nn12-20020a17090b38cc00b001f0c03d481asi1218480pjb.138.2022.07.14.00.47.49; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=cgUr0qoP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233914AbiGNHjb (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 03:39:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38816 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232072AbiGNHj2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 03:39:28 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-xa36.google.com (mail-vk1-xa36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 360E11D0EE; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:39:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk1-xa36.google.com with SMTP id y129so444386vkg.5; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:39:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uGTKzeprnwSXnbqHhlClhWNOVWDQWwVH82y8HTb0lvE=; b=cgUr0qoPFsYBx9z1B5gVXD5cyyb9a3Pzt3fzi4Uq8BT65Hz9RmzgG4qEHO/VpAeFpb BTGRaPlN5jMqUj9XSkP01TM2zhSDii5r5Z1mXIls5ho6yE059/wGZ57dDqRI9LFz8P2q SFZRhw+JHOVjXf/rYgGMjw1lZyJoLdwjq8jAi2xXmD8NDQu1thff1XIeE5VqlX6uzpLt Ss4YvsF+MjSMQ5f0Ym7qnDmuNNEBvowm5wN5zJrp+zkUvvpKtVb2ttLFuqne5xfHxR1B vEsGvJ8Gnc/9eggFbEz0Pa1QkioINAHtFen2cObZqaDgzIuNpoVYcPv+XkkfuNwIjsb/ wV9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uGTKzeprnwSXnbqHhlClhWNOVWDQWwVH82y8HTb0lvE=; b=3tmnJkg99izIDNv5y0uFned3gXfJS1zqljIzCVYDNOlD64sP/Do6qlqJKAxQ1lGLTN OriZv4TSWKKK1qLMkj3AH/ZCZKIgK2MbxRpkIAYE2B77ZphQk9V/Ebcj3B31/d+zyVBc hcWJlEPlY6xGXdmvRflvyX8xfVQgmPbYasT6Rx5HyqmlcLcSHP9IUNdXzHngGebInl1G kA9pm6/uG6OpQ+DuJjVDTC4c+mjCimj2Xd5VGlRCo5oQm+Q/q4hvlYP+Kjoe3Kj6OO4A 0jTxYJXdkcIG4OyG1PyOj/YMvZ0qYJBlq/TYlJLaEtoLwtBqX8mgDqXIDeo0aEUT75gw 7vSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9NvEHBL0SSoxpjckmxeUOdmFLsrp/6nNGJNeuC2Bpw5ZOQrtiq IO08KJ3vZ3v09TXeqZHes2khk4IEVLBDvioFgvc= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:a887:0:b0:36c:8458:b061 with SMTP id r129-20020a1fa887000000b0036c8458b061mr2831184vke.19.1657784365859; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:39:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220712075255.1345991-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn> <20220712075255.1345991-3-chenhuacai@loongson.cn> In-Reply-To: From: Huacai Chen Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 15:39:13 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] M68K: cpuinfo: Fix a warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: WANG Xuerui , Geert Uytterhoeven , Huacai Chen , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Michal Simek , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , Jeff Dike , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Linux-Arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Guo Ren , Jiaxun Yang , "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" , linux-m68k , Linux-sh list , linux-um , stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Arnd, On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 2:59 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 4:07 AM Huacai Chen wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 6:15 PM WANG Xuerui wrote: > > > On 2022/7/12 17:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > > But judging from the intent of this patch series (fixing WARNs on > > > certain configs), and that the triggering condition is currently > > > impossible on m68k (and other non-SMP) platforms, I think cleanups for > > > such arches could come as a separate patch series later. I think the > > > m68k refactoring is reasonable after all, due to my observation above, > > > but for the other non-SMP arches we may want to wait for the respective > > > maintainers' opinions. > > > > It seems that the best solution is only fix architectures with SMP > > support and leave others (m68k, microblaze, um) as is. :) > > I think it probably makes sense to do this as a combined cleanup patch, > which I can merge through the asm-generic tree, for all architectures > whose maintainer does not pick it up directly. For SMP architectures, > it's a bugfix that we probably want backported into stable kernels, while > for non-SMP targets it is just a minor cleanup for consistency. OK, I will send V2 later. Huacai > > Arnd