Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <f2a29c57-be8c-88c2-1c75-f6e5d1164b8f@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 12:45:54 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/9] dt-bindings: net: Expand pcs-handle to
 an array
Content-Language: en-US
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@nxp.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220711160519.741990-1-sean.anderson@seco.com>
 <20220711160519.741990-3-sean.anderson@seco.com>
 <ecaf9d0f-6ddb-5842-790e-3d5ee80e2a77@linaro.org>
 <fdd34075-4e5e-a617-696d-15c5ac6e9bfe@seco.com>
 <d84899e7-06f7-1a20-964f-90b6f0ff96fd@linaro.org>
 <Ys2aeRBGGv6ajMZ5@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <Ys2aeRBGGv6ajMZ5@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 12/07/2022 17:59, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>> However before implementing this, please wait for more feedback. Maybe
>> Rob or net folks will have different opinions.
> 
> We decided on "pcs-handle" for PCS for several drivers, to be consistent
> with the situation for network PHYs (which are "phy-handle", settled on
> after we also had "phy" and "phy-device" and decided to deprecate these
> two.
> 
> Surely we should have consistency within the net code - so either "phy"
> and "pcs" or "phy-handle" and "pcs-handle" but not a mixture of both?

True. Then the new property should be "pcs-handle-names"?

Best regards,
Krzysztof