Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp471481imw; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 05:07:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tUy2OOXvEaTNaS+iDgiCrrwjm+gL5ZyAjoZ9HKXcSWf9pYghl3RCMXUyUJm8Jj4h2h8e4T X-Received: by 2002:a50:fe83:0:b0:437:9c60:12f3 with SMTP id d3-20020a50fe83000000b004379c6012f3mr11673155edt.120.1657800475843; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 05:07:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657800475; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LvS2AH18URBQetDfNGd+uJ38xVZLHF9P2q+ksxJC/zDAYiIdNiqdBWqOfrwDzdM9BK XSh9yTJOKtnQMUQNLgW2+TS0cmQQZ5oRSwE0GnWoGZ4ByNs9cGRHM/xNRzLkTd028cCa 8lrHG4YKZCfWtf6ugezn5kHmRnFzCck2p3eBDJGiWJehci/V9NjEJkJbBFaiCaSVzCM8 8+LOtOBrECapmiieXemGl4zSs657QnqJzP5uZKt1dmO0DnCXc6p6um/wFzZr2IPbzKXY LXj+kL79//B9rNkNLA2AofrV1Wj8guVSRlgzQvnHx/F5jrDMEfZrPyl6eoja6K+Ra8Kt MBRQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=ftD8niJCQH72SxijgqHd2dFn91gGZK8M59i2TY/04HE=; b=BehEHcgN//M1cOT9AHa8V3Hzmted5nt+/pZmaXmi46S8ZOdrl33hjWTuaJqppRUKLu wRNLxIgXRMN1LKRaMVcJd/FEWG0ql5GXT/aMRUKtlwIyUYieTEHxzkymhAWX7tCuH1qW BY7CeA4+juLx6vMM1IHGqMQr4we6KE9dBnjl+LXhWI4cfAAtb2TIp80Zvj6KE4MyeMWQ 7ksJdlbUnN4crq37a6ZDuoOnGj9I8IFdUD1oN9wyRxGbMl5qVpPdOaZEE8HLEgqlotYV 3Dmo9jClT5yE37AgbGT4a+6+7Ss5yPsDFDVtXSC0kCBzduiI7ps+xo8zMM1UsYGsY4HO I4+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m21-20020aa7d355000000b0043120d5f3adsi1821295edr.135.2022.07.14.05.07.30; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 05:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238594AbiGNLGL (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 07:06:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46656 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229666AbiGNLGL (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 07:06:11 -0400 Received: from out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F4E300 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 04:06:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R141e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045168;MF=xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=13;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0VJJBXzu_1657796763; Received: from B-LB6YLVDL-0141.local(mailfrom:xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0VJJBXzu_1657796763) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 19:06:04 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] riscv: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump To: =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=c3=bcbner?= , Arnd Bergmann Cc: Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Guo Ren , Anup Patel , Nick Kossifidis , Mike Rapoport , linux-riscv , Linux Kernel Mailing List , huanyi.xj@alibaba-inc.com References: <20220714025901.359695-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> <3975689.5fSG56mABF@diego> From: Xianting Tian Message-ID: <46732d07-f14b-2fd1-5606-1582f69b8d00@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 19:06:03 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3975689.5fSG56mABF@diego> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2022/7/14 下午5:46, Heiko Stübner 写道: > Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2022, 11:17:26 CEST schrieb Xianting Tian: >> 在 2022/7/14 下午4:24, Arnd Bergmann 写道: >>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 4:59 AM Xianting Tian >>> wrote: >>>> As MODULES is only defined for CONFIG_64BIT, so we dump it when >>>> CONFIG_64BIT. >>> Doesn't this cause a compile-time error on 32-bit? >> I tested, rv32 compile is OK. >>>> (unsigned long)VMEMMAP_END); >>>> print_ml("vmalloc", (unsigned long)VMALLOC_START, >>>> (unsigned long)VMALLOC_END); >>>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)) >>>> + print_ml("modules", (unsigned long)MODULES_VADDR, >>>> + (unsigned long)MODULES_END); >>> The IS_ENABLED() check prevents the line from getting executed, but >>> unlike an #ifdef it still relies on it to be parsable. >> Thanks, I will use #ifdef instead of IS_ENABLED > Patch1 also has that issue with the thanks, I will modify it in V3. > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)) { > vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_VADDR)=0x%lx\n", MODULES_VADDR); > vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_END)=0x%lx\n", MODULES_END); > .... > > > module_alloc falls back to a weak variant [0] which is the same as the riscv variant > only then using VMALLOC_START - VMALLOC_END as range, as the riscv-variant > conditional to CONFIG_64BIT. yes, I ever checked, actually before 5.13, it doesn't define MODULES area but use VMALLOC for modules, crash> mod      MODULE       NAME           BASE           SIZE  OBJECT FILE ffffffdf8167f280  galcore  ffffffdf81646000  3075841  (not loaded)  [CONFIG_KALLSYMS] [    0.000000]      vmalloc : 0xffffffd000000000 - 0xffffffdfffffffff   (65535 MB) > > I'm wondering if it wouldn't be easier in the long run to just define > MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END for 32bit to use these values and get rid of > the CONFIG_64BIT ifdef we already have for MODULES (and new ones we are > introducing now). > > > Heiko > > > [0] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/kernel/module.c#L2835 > >