Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp584016imw; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 07:09:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tK8Lll/aV2OW7zjU0Sgi6kOUkWauB+fpuyRDEdFN6+ZPDG4YUa5QDEwTuPhoj0XUY7dZCN X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d30b:0:b0:43a:4bea:75c6 with SMTP id p11-20020aa7d30b000000b0043a4bea75c6mr12596499edq.12.1657807748187; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 07:09:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657807748; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VsaIRMj++psJwz85viRGTaWbiGTkKlFN1fznYoxDiRBE6dta2tHAhDXlNlF6upv7UI BOPe9QhJ4QT/vUboRn6HvASKmj3TfclmB6G65FUTnBsoxeZoY2jQpFED8M2byRshVPMu hnYhc9jBNNmImFqgSRO67sILKsBhQXu8maGZeG/nt1fY26bnSk3Y3OMvRcbar3x20lCS fLlnaJ8wIXNMOKd3sR4ZjGTRAXoTktkzNM9qR/nU/F5+TqE7dV8ZlLELmsL0gseT6Ser 0CIENSlyAtWalIhLUXnUsX9RRkyI2tJ3JdF0KYfQxtWc42sI0vH9xFJ0Gl03WvX0bieK nsjg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Y48E6PDFxhOGhAYVKqWlob2V1GffQky6+hara5tcdLo=; b=uKrblJUUYrAMpNKNGY9MKchAgG73FaolEO8n7ls7UccMVVKnxOT0rh/X8qceIV3APN JSzYwlYuRcusFUM0Be44Y7RlNBhF0ZRd6YAUyyuFTGU3pKE+UOgt6TtfkfrtDPEThKi9 i5AFaGEq2lOUl1ogZg1BbobsXOGTVE8SQqg/b1JKt+wnKshp9zb7VGhxj0hItltIbooM aGZIuHeejnl62nA2VbdrvvtpNWjUTTioY43tgg6p7ZtLbq2SPbBo151b9+WsAAr0jfIl LUBQPLaBlBKvKhRouUl/b6JwPNxxAs0wPm3RHNXD0rBDIJGPNv7zpOpbhGtUZN7ZZjc1 Vgpg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=x9Hqw1BT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ho11-20020a1709070e8b00b0072ed9eda8e6si2734670ejc.985.2022.07.14.07.08.41; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 07:09:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=x9Hqw1BT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239526AbiGNNPx (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 09:15:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41874 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239387AbiGNNPs (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 09:15:48 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 363A1545F1 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 06:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id o7so2731709lfq.9 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 06:15:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Y48E6PDFxhOGhAYVKqWlob2V1GffQky6+hara5tcdLo=; b=x9Hqw1BTgXzHKBiG2OLYcS2qRp7Sz3flmFvjdYEncU8GDBZQGFzRHDqWvl2GZEQzWs FsmPaPtuFGaiqKXQ0rgYuY1IJvGT9XHaKIiGie3uBqCYb5yZUxsGKCGerqVb/EDy2MQy BrkIPlpMjIIODx0OZIpPfuVTK/CPTmssfDzD87fRsv5/iF7Rkgzt3wvFTahxaqIGZ+wF b0LxvmpRxROYRG7PvrgPGM3wSIagrIcIKwRXmd8quwYVM2XgRpqq7+pGhei6aj5AEZ1a ZxtNyfAEF5Qg5TkVb401bU9vk1vAqt7Jy4UkztS6JIJpbx4jaxv5mhURfqXHgOZyi+xk gVtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y48E6PDFxhOGhAYVKqWlob2V1GffQky6+hara5tcdLo=; b=ldaLjWBVlmGo/OQWY22vF/X3BmAyNQyVIvf8ZMxnG2YiSW/FncRg+km6q7kk9xnHJB 8tpS64PYChQaemnrFcBJ2Arq3hqJIMGRXEM5gP6op+Fz4ahBGFvprykHBdSRWl1+nYq4 3gYsVNSL1vsdAdcD9I+gFA7HjuNZd84GBOFTI3eLyg7I15bj6xLFcf8H7leOUNueaJIj ULjlecLs+Ll4uhiq6KtNjLvTPjphu8Q/GzwKzcJtDm0xcktYanNo8WQr19vIIf5rBNKe gNaV6WFtQMQWh0A4DcJuuOY4isCpyxtJTUG3Z9yJLJ+Q7wxeiKk4IzxA2GvhddxeaYdL UZVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/4kHP4fH+F5oktqhZxb1FKjMsiCpc9EsJ1qPGk1/73OvWdnkcQ pPYktOMA5v9R0k79XYczAZez9tPpLro+2EWcqoHGCQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:139a:b0:48a:1a73:8adc with SMTP id p26-20020a056512139a00b0048a1a738adcmr1218415lfa.226.1657804544526; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 06:15:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220710230603.13526-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> <20220710230603.13526-5-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> <4d198463-fedc-a5d9-6804-63c134da76e7@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <4d198463-fedc-a5d9-6804-63c134da76e7@linaro.org> From: Sam Protsenko Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 16:15:33 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] iommu/exynos: Use lookup based approach to access registers To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Janghyuck Kim , Cho KyongHo , Daniel Mentz , David Virag , Sumit Semwal , iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 19:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: [snip] > > +static void sysmmu_write(struct sysmmu_drvdata *data, size_t idx, u32 val) > > +{ > > + writel(val, data->sfrbase + data->regs[idx]); > > Beside what Robin wrote, I also don't think these wrappers actually > help, because you reverse arguments comparing to writel. > > How about having a per-variant structure with offsets and using it like: > > #define SYSMMU_REG(data, reg) ((data)->sfrbase + (data)->variant->reg) > writel(CTRL_ENABLE, SYSMMU_REG(data, mmu_ctrl_reg)) > > Would that be more readable? > Yes, this looks better for my taste too. I tend to get a tunnel vision when working with downstream code for a while. But I noticed that that approach is used sometimes as well, e.g. in drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c (in struct samsung_pin_bank_type). Anyway, I've reworked it exactly as you suggested, will send v2 soon. Thanks! > > Best regards, > Krzysztof