Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     vaishnav.a@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     p.yadav@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com
In-Reply-To: <20220601071611.11853-1-vaishnav.a@ti.com>
References: <20220601071611.11853-1-vaishnav.a@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] spi: cadence-quadspi: Remove spi_master_put() in probe failure path
Message-Id: <165780707568.72312.6357335988927291228.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:57:55 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:46:11 +0530, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
> Currently the spi_master is allocated by devm_spi_alloc_master()
> and devres core manages the deallocation, but in probe failure
> path spi_master_put() is being handled manually which causes
> "refcount underflow use-after-free" warning when probe failure happens
> after allocating spi_master.
> 
> Trimmed backtrace during failure:
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: cadence-quadspi: Remove spi_master_put() in probe failure path
      commit: 73d5fe046270281a46344e06bf986c607632f7ea

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark