Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220707081826.953449-1-Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
 <20220707081826.953449-3-Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com> <20220714141041.GB2229197-robh@kernel.org>
 <YtAkwcwXaQqZV75d@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <YtAkwcwXaQqZV75d@sirena.org.uk>
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 08:23:39 -0600
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKu_HCDoPBTcVdVV2JyD_8p3+cbrNC0u6VrK85vWZmt3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: regulator: add bindings for output-supply
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@9elements.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 8:14 AM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 08:10:41AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 10:18:24AM +0200, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> > > Add a devicetree binding for the 9elements,output-supply driver.
>
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    enum:
> > > +      - 9elements,output-supply
>
> > Why does this have a vendor prefix when it appears to be a s/w
> > construct?
>
> It's a description of a power supply output from their system (system as
> a whole, not power provisioned within the system).

Well, that's a better commit message than the original, but I still
don't understand.

Rob