Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 17:43:17 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To:     Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
Cc:     christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, atomlin@atomlin.com,
        oleksandr@natalenko.name, neelx@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] module: Show the last unloaded module's taint
 flag(s)
Message-ID: <YtC4JWQqG8gOYlad@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20220714153933.2095776-1-atomlin@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220714153933.2095776-1-atomlin@redhat.com>
Sender: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 04:39:30PM +0100, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> Hi Luis, Christophe,
> 
> In addition to the previous iteration, since this particular series does
> indeed modify last_unloaded_module, I decided to use strscpy() as a
> replacement for the now deprecated strlcpy().

Nice, looks super clean now, applied and pushed to modules-next, thanks!
BTW since you and Christophe seem to contribute a lot to modules lately,
any chance for future stuff you can ask 0day folks to add your trees
and branches to get tested prior to posting patches? Then you can
suggest in your cover letter they've been blessed by 0-day or whatever.

Typically I push to modules-testing, wait and if no complaints come back
then I push to modules-next but in this case I just went to
modules-next directly as I couldn't see how this could break.

  Luis