Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp67159imw; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 20:50:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1usr8paZXR+LYFKl8yxJhHyq6tfHgOz8qMO+MIGN0RTLFnuEGfG4MPb4gV2y5P50Txs+C+T X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:408f:b0:1d1:d1ba:2abb with SMTP id l15-20020a17090a408f00b001d1d1ba2abbmr19970243pjg.152.1657857056237; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 20:50:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657857056; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UWLjXOBuPCaT6ocu59LZkz3BQ2xWCQYdth+LLTjo6Xuw8gPr9rh+aX4v9YaUnlPaYY JLqkI3ANUIFrIUEczuf+PoqUxOx/jt5C+3vi9+gU8nQ6JiynoyfzjoEHJ41PcdzzrJv3 /XCBor/zwSIA4ZSkX/oTfOz/Rsul/JvA8glJM6yGz4+Cdb8wDDE0Es/9IiCGe8KYFQka cG6ZybvWEoYkYClvC4f1b3X7tFR1sWv5ih9hfP+hsXiIllbLKml7BpA6kGMHsV8dYvmY ah4ZPkjU1YlrwO6RCSZgP2a/04lLcIc2jXzmR+njx6QEF9PtxqOXQRE0eBh4SpRhpyOs W0lw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=UDJUtdDZkxHUpctz4ye/LYzxtILs3nWjpfaF9QwNa1Y=; b=tEPKikA4KR727+tsAFhyctU8bo8D/B5yxk8pyAuO5qfHkVL70Ma5pQlGRcXGUoeUf/ uXh/exB6aLxfrKElaCAsz7LLN5RKQpDuhIpNGOq2wZJXwECpBTWrlS6GIL3KeBqTw3ow J4fiASc9z/mpmtJVi1sf3LsHSTNP72LvltFqcptYm2Mmox10u14hx7JFNmSSg5eUeN9N VMJIyns/1ypcWguwILQHyIA/aIMG8x/KCKdJNjpreld+qil2G1lz6E1D186XE9SeureL 9+V9w2WdKIun6upSDInGpuMETeFUMPKe8145/kZOoLam5er1moezq589oWl4l864oi5k NVCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i7-20020a17090332c700b0016c0b0d2ecbsi4939143plr.174.2022.07.14.20.50.21; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 20:50:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241261AbiGOD3o (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 23:29:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48602 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229481AbiGOD3n (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 23:29:43 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D131274DF3 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 20:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LkcHK0QjNzkWkK; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:27:25 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.178.157] (10.174.178.157) by kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:29:38 +0800 Message-ID: <58ff7708-e659-2b21-7de6-2dad845fec2f@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:29:28 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] memblock,arm64: Expand the static memblock memory table Content-Language: en-US To: Will Deacon CC: , , , , , , , References: <20220615102742.96450-1-zhouguanghui1@huawei.com> <20220628110301.GA23703@willie-the-truck> From: Zhou Guanghui In-Reply-To: <20220628110301.GA23703@willie-the-truck> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.157] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022/6/28 19:03, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:27:42AM +0000, Zhou Guanghui wrote: >> In a system(Huawei Ascend ARM64 SoC) using HBM, a multi-bit ECC error >> occurs, and the BIOS will mark the corresponding area (for example, 2 MB) >> as unusable. When the system restarts next time, these areas are not >> reported or reported as EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY. Both cases lead to an >> increase in the number of memblocks, whereas EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY >> leads to a larger number of memblocks. >> >> For example, if the EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY type is reported: >> ... >> memory[0x92] [0x0000200834a00000-0x0000200835bfffff], 0x0000000001200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x93] [0x0000200835c00000-0x0000200835dfffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4 >> memory[0x94] [0x0000200835e00000-0x00002008367fffff], 0x0000000000a00000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x95] [0x0000200836800000-0x00002008369fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4 >> memory[0x96] [0x0000200836a00000-0x0000200837bfffff], 0x0000000001200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x97] [0x0000200837c00000-0x0000200837dfffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4 >> memory[0x98] [0x0000200837e00000-0x000020087fffffff], 0x0000000048200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x99] [0x0000200880000000-0x0000200bcfffffff], 0x0000000350000000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x9a] [0x0000200bd0000000-0x0000200bd01fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4 >> memory[0x9b] [0x0000200bd0200000-0x0000200bd07fffff], 0x0000000000600000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x9c] [0x0000200bd0800000-0x0000200bd09fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4 >> memory[0x9d] [0x0000200bd0a00000-0x0000200fcfffffff], 0x00000003ff600000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x9e] [0x0000200fd0000000-0x0000200fd01fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4 >> memory[0x9f] [0x0000200fd0200000-0x0000200fffffffff], 0x000000002fe00000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 >> ... >> >> The EFI memory map is parsed to construct the memblock arrays before >> the memblock arrays can be resized. As the result, memory regions >> beyond INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS are lost. >> >> Add a new macro INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGTIONS to replace > > nit: s/REGTIONS/REGIONS/ > >> INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGTIONS to define the size of the static memblock.memory >> array. >> >> Allow overriding memblock.memory array size with architecture defined >> INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS and make arm64 to set >> INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS to 1024 when CONFIG_EFI is enabled. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhou Guanghui >> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport >> Tested-by: Darren Hart >> --- >> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 9 +++++++++ >> mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++++----- >> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h >> index 0af70d9abede..ce8614fa376a 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h >> @@ -364,6 +364,15 @@ void dump_mem_limit(void); >> # define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + NR_CPUS + 1) >> #endif >> >> +/* >> + * memory regions which marked with flag MEMBLOCK_NOMAP(for example, the memory >> + * of the EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY type) may divide a continuous memory block into >> + * multiple parts. As a result, the number of memory regions is large. >> + */ >> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI >> +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 8) >> +#endif >> + >> #include >> >> #endif /* __ASM_MEMORY_H */ > > For the arm64 bit: > > Acked-by: Will Deacon > > I'm assuming Andrew will pick this up, but please yell if you'd prefer it > to go via the arm64 tree. Andrew, do you have any suggestions for this patch? > > Will >