Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753344AbXFAWK6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2007 18:10:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751590AbXFAWKt (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2007 18:10:49 -0400 Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:60054 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751501AbXFAWKs (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2007 18:10:48 -0400 To: "Scott Preece" Cc: "John Anthony Kazos Jr." , "H. Peter Anvin" , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by: References: <200706010209.l51299kN000531@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <28278.1180675923@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <465FB862.207@zytor.com> <7b69d1470706011237j50f29e4ch73f86acdc294fecd@mail.gmail.com> From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:10:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <7b69d1470706011237j50f29e4ch73f86acdc294fecd@mail.gmail.com> (Scott Preece's message of "Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:37:54 -0500") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 746 Lines: 17 "Scott Preece" writes: > This is a question worth answering - is it rude to ack/nak a patch if > you're not a maintainer or otherwise known-to-be-trusted, or is it OK > for anyone to express an opinion? Andrew's patch text seems to imply > that it's generally OK. Every pair of eyes (or a single one) looking at the patch in question is a good thing. I can't imagine why would one want to look at the code if he/she can't ack or nak or otherwise comment it. -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/