Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220716170201.2020510-1-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com> <20220717235000.247bfa42.max@enpas.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220717235000.247bfa42.max@enpas.org>
From:   Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jul 2022 09:18:37 +0200
Message-ID: <CABGWkvpK25WGjp76_=Jfd9sMk5Dvj84VnVuc3iuroKR0tJEv+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] can: can327: remove useless header inclusions
To:     Max Staudt <max@enpas.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
        linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Max,

On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 11:50 PM Max Staudt <max@enpas.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:02:01 +0200
> Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
>
> > -#include <linux/init.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > -
> > -#include <linux/bitops.h>
> > -#include <linux/ctype.h>
> > -#include <linux/errno.h>
> > -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > -#include <linux/list.h>
> > -#include <linux/lockdep.h>
> > -#include <linux/netdevice.h>
> > -#include <linux/skbuff.h>
> > -#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > -#include <linux/string.h>
> >  #include <linux/tty.h>
> > -#include <linux/tty_ldisc.h>
> > -#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > -
> > -#include <uapi/linux/tty.h>
> > -
> > -#include <linux/can.h>
> >  #include <linux/can/dev.h>
> > -#include <linux/can/error.h>
> >  #include <linux/can/rx-offload.h>
>
> AFAIK, the coding style is to not rely on headers including other
> headers. Instead, the appropriate header for every symbol used should
> be included.

Thanks for the explanation.

>
> This is also valid for the similar patch you submitted for slcan.

Probably something can be removed (if_arp.h, if_ether.h, ...).
I will take can327.c as a reference.

Thanks and regards,
Dario

>
>
> Unless something has changed, this is a NAK from me, sorry.
>
>
> Max


-- 

Dario Binacchi

Embedded Linux Developer

dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com

__________________________________


Amarula Solutions SRL

Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT

T. +39 042 243 5310
info@amarulasolutions.com

www.amarulasolutions.com