Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp3938840imw; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:57:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vP1SFfXJdXDL8xQEdPBQ+l1HUqnfIvUlbKMnwSImaHNv2+PimScZjVqUiX9aMrTSONob6u X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2086:b0:717:4e91:f1db with SMTP id 6-20020a170906208600b007174e91f1dbmr27862143ejq.345.1658192221735; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:57:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1658192221; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GMywaXr5VZqKS1XiIFBSSKT3VEdM/lUdQas1GtgF5tl13yR7nOwFVQMlOQ16/mge/G BURoTHIVQAfXRVZSF3g+4HbmPXXCVssxnCN0rqcdFZ3+0qqNqP9OAV8DZy/61rnO/Whg zR/kH92euaNT0tLjLHbfTq9RqVPjBoynEBlFBqdCDw2+eJ7AkeLfPYIlqDyRYPrEVTa1 hriAhkfApLCo4P+bGHVMASvhrO7M5KhClKg7366ZJPkj7i5n6yros2WHT08jk0Ci2Bsg KxCk8tbp3GR+5aT/cniSCWGPzuCnLFpLHhBnccX6D5Kt1BUJFmO62DtNFRzp9NAqjGi5 8uEQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=2lsamAysK+D7t3yFkcKTH1MEIBtg3Azfl3puoX8VWXY=; b=LCxkiaAqvF8NyfX5x65Ml9SXpz0sevdJNyNXhIM2tOR+7t+e21TWWvZM02/h6C4j/q xhaUyPB2Qn3vuDFFyToSdvKlkMrrZTDYOq1MWxv5flin6b4II4UPLKBVPWNJZ+wHiUI7 CSYSqmP+XkuCMW1eSmp0QdNQ/rkA7GmYONtgNANWXyV0INsujPr2fVttzpEu+LO24UnZ ENDk5Ix3YDz7QYKzVf7oqyHM5S7iR/sMEUSL8PCHKvJ3YGpyqeDKpc2EF3PvsE7jp2cc PRPqDnCyGz8vjkEgBlpPhMlPWLRqnohZJw849t6e7HUfcfBLA/ImOXJiaK2k62kMO7Pw hgSQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=N1Wbe909; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id nc24-20020a1709071c1800b007262ce19578si18212648ejc.549.2022.07.18.17.56.37; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=N1Wbe909; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235799AbiGSAb6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 Jul 2022 20:31:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38062 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230104AbiGSAb5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2022 20:31:57 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb30.google.com (mail-yb1-xb30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b30]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BF81FCF9 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:31:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb30.google.com with SMTP id j67so1292516ybb.3 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:31:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2lsamAysK+D7t3yFkcKTH1MEIBtg3Azfl3puoX8VWXY=; b=N1Wbe909IAYh0k1c0q3IBpwrF0vkTzYBojcD7NeJU3RTBP0OrIsiUGrpT4h6qpZf3V QDNioz9XC8Lw6egH20udd0+qOkhomryPva44T+r4z2lA6qfIU4I5Mg8K+C4gXTGyqnI8 PaJkgvRSpy7dY3eV9EsscgTCZSVRB9yK9+KDqyVBzAHl7MO+vOkp8oYMiCZG5jeOqATi ItXnvm4JA9a8YY6Rz+vn/NRS5OFaBHdLX2V7ycQLodgUMBJiv64oguOV0wW5asLGQpsa hNL7a8Sz/P584O+kqiTPBOOiNjbUc3zZVYochBrQFUpXJzYhScAP2rwRC4JBqRIxix4f 0PaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2lsamAysK+D7t3yFkcKTH1MEIBtg3Azfl3puoX8VWXY=; b=3pT+jXbMvqrHWcal+C/yykgaDWCpyxiH2nMatJ0bC783588ESKFyjuJ5XndpvaFvgk tZ4KE0XbNXnD9FsRPhE6WM2DUUMlwqUoX8xt5aD/+mAaYrxDwsvRlelaPhLTVsIzk3Oi NGc/bx8PsqUOXXsev986mo+Suyo54pfQPZVp+jYNdmxvSvx1ZgH4O5zIaPOwNSciuQAn JTpot2aL9MHquz2U9JA053h+4VNIcONEcYhiCL5zFIgD/tVgGId7vHoIG7JgBi+9WnHI 8THnek/+49fYSA8+6dHahd2Asp1grF+m1k415CqTkAYd4POK6XWS9o8+FTag5zkbV916 Ii9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8NO22EBdwq0mWD/P+iChxdvWzOuhp0tFCPEz9BYE/ln01fEaYY j2HACCVuiJOzTi9QfE36CtMxLDSdYLGzDlamu7pzHQ== X-Received: by 2002:a25:868b:0:b0:670:830c:15aa with SMTP id z11-20020a25868b000000b00670830c15aamr40509ybk.297.1658190715594; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:31:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220614120231.48165-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20220627113019.3q62luiay7izhehr@black.fi.intel.com> <20220627122230.7eetepoufd5w3lxd@black.fi.intel.com> <20220627223808.ihgy3epdx6ofll43@black.fi.intel.com> <20220718172159.4vwjzrfthelovcty@black.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Dionna Amalie Glaze Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:31:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 00/14] mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Peter Gonda , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Sean Christopherson , Andrew Morton , Joerg Roedel , Andi Kleen , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , David Rientjes , Vlastimil Babka , Tom Lendacky , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Paolo Bonzini , Ingo Molnar , Varad Gautam , Dario Faggioli , Dave Hansen , Mike Rapoport , David Hildenbrand , Marcelo Cerri , tim.gardner@canonical.com, Khalid ElMously , philip.cox@canonical.com, "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Linux Memory Management List , linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-efi , LKML , "Yao, Jiewen" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > I think we should make it obvious from a kernel image if it supports > > unaccepted memory (with UTS_VERSION or other way). > > Something I didn't address in my previous email: how would the UEFI know where the kernel is to parse this UTS_VERSION out when it's booting a bootloader before Linux gets booted? -- -Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)