Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <62d60f73.1c69fb81.feea9.5487@mx.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 03:40:00 +0200
From:   Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] clk: qcom: gcc-ipq806x: remove cc_register_board
 for pxo and cxo
References: <20220706225321.26215-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20220706225321.26215-5-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <YtX2///aNWyhKpJn@builder.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YtX2///aNWyhKpJn@builder.lan>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 07:12:47PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed 06 Jul 17:53 CDT 2022, Christian Marangi wrote:
> 
> > Now that these clock are defined as fixed clk in dts, we can drop the
> > register_board_clk for cxo_board and pxo_board in gcc_ipq806x_probe.
> > 
> 
> Are you trying to say, that now that we have .fw_name based lookup of
> these clocks we don't need the globally registered [cp]xo clocks to
> bridge towards the [cp]xo_board_clocks which was introduced in:
> 
> 30fc4212d541 ("arm: dts: qcom: Add more board clocks")
> 
> I think this change would work out if you also replace .name = "pxo"
> with .name = "pxo_board_clk" (and same for cxo)...
>

Mhhh why pxo_board_clk? Why _clk? It should be pxo_board.
Anyway about this, only the rpm clocks use pxo_board as parent,
everything else use pxo. Aside from rpm and gcc the other user of pxo is
the lcc driver and the krait-xcc clock. I sent patches to convert them.

> 
> But I don't think we can just drop these, as it would break
> compatibility with existing devicetree.

Wonder if we will be able to drop this ever? 

> > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq806x.c | 8 --------
> >  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq806x.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq806x.c
> > index 718de17a1e60..883629de2751 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq806x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq806x.c
> > @@ -3384,14 +3384,6 @@ static int gcc_ipq806x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	struct regmap *regmap;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -	ret = qcom_cc_register_board_clk(dev, "cxo_board", "cxo", 25000000);
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> > -
> > -	ret = qcom_cc_register_board_clk(dev, "pxo_board", "pxo", 25000000);
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> > -
> >  	if (of_machine_is_compatible("qcom,ipq8065")) {
> >  		ubi32_core1_src_clk.freq_tbl = clk_tbl_nss_ipq8065;
> >  		ubi32_core2_src_clk.freq_tbl = clk_tbl_nss_ipq8065;
> > -- 
> > 2.36.1
> > 

-- 
	Ansuel