Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <62d686c0.1c69fb81.4a957.bf03@mx.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:19:32 +0200
From:   Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: qcom: ipq8064: reorganize node order and
 sort them
References: <20220718153815.29414-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <7f2a4f21-5e07-9320-8f7b-573ccc562f43@linaro.org>
 <CAA8EJppCxrcQOtCDZvUX-CThGV7aZXYv__gz3KRBf28TCRTBEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <78230095-6b45-4536-f41d-12bb23308d34@linaro.org>
 <f625ccde-8ecd-c06d-e8b2-ecb51c9ac9b8@somainline.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f625ccde-8ecd-c06d-e8b2-ecb51c9ac9b8@somainline.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:22:24PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 19.07.2022 12:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 19/07/2022 11:59, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 12:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 18/07/2022 17:38, Christian Marangi wrote:
> >>>> Reorganize node order and sort them by address.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> This was picked from for-next qcom branch [1]. Reorganize dtsi as requested.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git/?h=for-next
> >>>
> >>> If this is picked by qcom branch, no need to resend it.
> >>>
> >>> I don't see value in such reshuffle. Reviewing is not possible and you
> >>> did not mention tests (results should be equal).
> >>
> >> The value is usual for all the cleanups: make it follow the
> >> established practice.
> > 
> > Are you sure this is established practice?
> Yes.
> 
>  New DTSI files (see SC8280XP,
> > sm8450 although sc7280 looked ordered) do not always follow it, so why
> > imposing it for existing code?
> Perhaps it slipped through review.. Partially my bad.
> 
> 
> Such reshuffle can cause conflicts thus
> > stops parallel development. Review is close to impossible...
> Almost any addition or removal also causes conflicts, because git is
> not as smart as we would like it to be. If the commit is structured
> properly (i.e. it *only* changes the order and nothing else),
> decompiling the dtbs before and after applying it and using a tool
> like meld that can find similar chunks of text at different offsets
> review is definitely possible, though not very pleasant (you can't
> just diff them, as order is preserved & phandles change due to that)
> as you have to look at it manually and can't tell much by just taking
> a look at the email.
>

Can you give me an example of such tool? So I can put these data in the
commit description. I have to rebase this anyway as more changes got
merged so it might be a good idea to add more info about how this won't
make actualy changes.

> Konrad
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof

-- 
	Ansuel