Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763209AbXFBWJj (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:09:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760152AbXFBWJc (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:09:32 -0400 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([75.144.35.66]:50104 "EHLO lucidpixels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757767AbXFBWJc (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:09:32 -0400 Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:09:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Justin Piszcz X-X-Sender: jpiszcz@p34.internal.lan To: Christian Kujau cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1014 Lines: 30 On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: >> Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in >> development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2 duo coretemp patch by >> ruik which I want be running as long as 2.6.22-rc3 does not have any severe >> XFS issues? > > Tracking -rc and running 2.6.22-rc3 for a couple of days now, no problems > with xfs since this infamous 2.6.17 thingy[0]. But that's pretty useless > information I guess, since your setup will be different from mine. Did you > have anything "special" in mind when asking this? > > C. > > [0] http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#dir2 > -- > BOFH excuse #339: > > manager in the cable duct > Thanks, I'll give it a go then--! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/