Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763629AbXFBWyV (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:54:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761716AbXFBWyO (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:54:14 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:40703 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761670AbXFBWyO (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:54:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4661F511.4070207@goop.org> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:54:09 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Piszcz CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 763 Lines: 17 Justin Piszcz wrote: > Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in > development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2 duo coretemp patch > by ruik which I want be running as long as 2.6.22-rc3 does not have > any severe XFS issues? XFS currently has a data-corrupting bug, where files which were appended by small amounts may lose their updates on umount - I see this corrupting hg repos. There's a patch which works for me, and is in 2.6.22-rc3-mm1, but it hasn't been merged upstream yet. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/