Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758579AbXFCEJl (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 00:09:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752004AbXFCEJd (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 00:09:33 -0400 Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:36480 "EHLO rgminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751690AbXFCEJd (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 00:09:33 -0400 Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 21:06:14 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: "Scott Preece" Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Adrian Bunk" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by: Message-Id: <20070602210614.75862701.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <7b69d1470706021957t4d6a1b43k33c0766b27975f31@mail.gmail.com> References: <200706010209.l51299kN000531@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20070602141144.GC5500@stusta.de> <20070602104700.53b6b811.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <7b69d1470706021957t4d6a1b43k33c0766b27975f31@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1732 Lines: 45 On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 19:57:41 -0700 Scott Preece wrote: > On 6/2/07, Andrew Morton wrote: > > ... > > +The Signed-off-by: tag implies that the signer was involved in the development > --- > > Change "implies" to "indicates" - it's an explicit statement, not an > implication. > > --- > > +of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path. > > + > > +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a > > +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can > > +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog. > > + > > +Acked-by: is often used by the maintainer of the affected code when that > > +maintainer neither contributed to nor forwarded the patch themselves. > --- > > This using plural pronouns for indefinite gender leaves one in vague > territory, but I think "themself" would be better than "themselves, > since "maintainer" is singular. ugh. :( not-acked-by: /me I would like to say "no such word," but I googled it and found lots of references to it, most of which say "sub-standard," "nonstandard," "mythical," "vulgar," or "colloq." But my search was not exhaustive. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=themself http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/004285.html http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/themself http://www.allwords.com/word-themself.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/