Return-Path: <owner-linux-kernel-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu>
Received: (majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu) by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id <S157346AbQHAHeO>; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 03:34:14 -0400
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <S157228AbQHAHeE>; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 03:34:04 -0400
Received: from lancaster.nexor.co.uk ([193.63.53.1]:50831 "EHLO lancaster.nexor.co.uk") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <S157113AbQHAHd5>; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 03:33:57 -0400
To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: RLIM_INFINITY inconsistency between archs
In-Reply-To: Your message of "31 Jul 2000 17:26:00 +0200." <7iw6lD2Xw-B@khms.westfalen.de>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 08:53:59 +0100
From: David Howells <David.Howells@nexor.co.uk>
Message-Id: <20000801073357Z157113-15702+213@vger.rutgers.edu>
Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Content-Length: 474
Lines: 14

Kai Henningsen wrote:
> I notice just about everybody suggesting absolute paths.
>
> Try relative paths or environment variables instead. This has the  
> advantage of working anywhere you damn well please.

Relative to what? Which environment variables? Who sets these variables?

David Howells

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/