Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   ira.weiny@intel.com
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
        =?UTF-8?q?Krzysztof=20Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
        Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
        Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V16 5/6] driver-core: Introduce BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_{RO,RW}
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 13:52:48 -0700
Message-Id: <20220719205249.566684-6-ira.weiny@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220719205249.566684-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>
References: <20220719205249.566684-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>

Many binary attributes need to limit access to CAP_SYS_ADMIN only; ie
many binary attributes specify is_visible with 0400 or 0600.

Make setting the permissions of such attributes more explicit by
defining BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_{RO,RW}.

Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>

---
Changes from V12:
	Pick up review tag
	Bjorn:
		NOTE: this has a lot of similarities to
		https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210416205856.3234481-7-kw@linux.com/
		I'm not sure why that patch was not picked up.  But I've
		added Krzysztof as a suggested by if that is ok?

Changes from V11:
	New Patch
---
 include/linux/sysfs.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/sysfs.h b/include/linux/sysfs.h
index e3f1e8ac1f85..fd3fe5c8c17f 100644
--- a/include/linux/sysfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/sysfs.h
@@ -235,6 +235,22 @@ struct bin_attribute bin_attr_##_name = __BIN_ATTR_WO(_name, _size)
 #define BIN_ATTR_RW(_name, _size)					\
 struct bin_attribute bin_attr_##_name = __BIN_ATTR_RW(_name, _size)
 
+
+#define __BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_RO(_name, _size) {					\
+	.attr	= { .name = __stringify(_name), .mode = 0400 },		\
+	.read	= _name##_read,						\
+	.size	= _size,						\
+}
+
+#define __BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_RW(_name, _size)					\
+	__BIN_ATTR(_name, 0600, _name##_read, _name##_write, _size)
+
+#define BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_RO(_name, _size)					\
+struct bin_attribute bin_attr_##_name = __BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_RO(_name, _size)
+
+#define BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_RW(_name, _size)					\
+struct bin_attribute bin_attr_##_name = __BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_RW(_name, _size)
+
 struct sysfs_ops {
 	ssize_t	(*show)(struct kobject *, struct attribute *, char *);
 	ssize_t	(*store)(struct kobject *, struct attribute *, const char *, size_t);
-- 
2.35.3