Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 12:47:32 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To:     Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the amdgpu tree
Message-ID: <20220720124732.4aeb3748@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20220719123607.63cbb3c5@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20220719123607.63cbb3c5@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/bAqkNotV=p56vHJYCfytCa7";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/bAqkNotV=p56vHJYCfytCa7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:36:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> =
wrote:
>
> After merging the amdgpu tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>=20
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/display_mode_vba_32.c:=
 In function 'DISPCLKDPPCLKDCFCLKDeepSleepPrefetchParametersWatermarksAndPe=
rformanceCalculation':
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/display_mode_vba_32.c:=
1659:1: error: the frame size of 2144 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wer=
ror=3Dframe-larger-than=3D]
>  1659 | }
>       | ^

The above is fixed today.

> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/display_mode_vba_32.c:=
 In function 'dml32_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull':
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/display_mode_vba_32.c:=
3799:1: error: the frame size of 2464 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wer=
ror=3Dframe-larger-than=3D]
>  3799 | } // ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull
>       | ^

This is still here, but the frame size is down to 2336.

> Using the amdgpu tree from next-20220718 fixes the problem, so I have
> done that for today.

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

--Sig_/bAqkNotV=p56vHJYCfytCa7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmLXbMQACgkQAVBC80lX
0Gw68Af/fUmC0SSaPlOJ9Sjug3IL+2hL1flEUmVRMg5OgLM9EFFSSRkb9xs7riPO
RxTBlg36lLGdOyh0m/qGCpO66uG43LgX+M6g/yZHJi8UJ40sMP3jAifhHAnB3j7r
ldb3+0RMiwgFNLXQyrXlRPGDsQLZRBJSSuM7I1qmupnh5i7hA04nS9K3RD0IYioi
yloiid2bZq7Z3a8qkGX2kY2BzDukqlug7eRuN1oBU3/2NOARxdJDsLeNVRK88HgY
kNOG38yI8ghHVn+ybubpfKJv0AzCscbWCkjrxV59X8HIf09p5RocdNi7Sj5bC4bZ
mIullasXmnSOyuHKkTG/30DVJFWDQg==
=AUtf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/bAqkNotV=p56vHJYCfytCa7--