Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1ca489cc-491d-f78f-5743-fd47d6c98efb@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <1ca489cc-491d-f78f-5743-fd47d6c98efb@gmx.de>
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 15:35:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CADVatmNrb4fH8OLvrAtT0vjhZCYvcc9+OpQnjypuxHCtXqXd2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/231] 5.18.13-rc1 review
To:     Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:35 PM Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> hallo Greg
>
> 5.18.13-rc1
>
> compiles here with a lot of warnings on an x86_64
> (Intel i5-11400, Fedora 36)
>
> warnings all over the tree like this:
> ...
> arch/x86/crypto/twofish-x86_64-asm_64.o: warning: objtool:
> twofish_enc_blk()+0x7b2: 'naked' return found in RETPOLINE build
> arch/x86/crypto/twofish-x86_64-asm_64.o: warning: objtool:
> twofish_dec_blk()+0x7b2: 'naked' return found in RETPOLINE build
> ...
>
> patch was applied to an clean 5.18.12
>
> is it just me ?

No, I can see on my builds too.


-- 
Regards
Sudip