Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:44:07 +0200
From:   Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] s390/crash: support multi-segment iterators
Message-ID: <Ytgix++fJp7mICzx@li-4a3a4a4c-28e5-11b2-a85c-a8d192c6f089.ibm.com>
References: <cover.1658206891.git.agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
 <YtdzwLXFMuv02JEA@ZenIV>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YtdzwLXFMuv02JEA@ZenIV>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 04:17:20AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> OK...  Do you prefer it to go through s390 tree?  The thing is, I've
> stuff in iov_iter tree that conflicts with it; I'll gladly drop that
> bit (vfs.git #fixes-s390) in favour of your series (and drop s390
> bits from "new iov_iter flavour - ITER_UBUF" in #work.iov_iter - they
> are not needed anymore).
> 
> I can put your series into replacement of #fixes-s390, or pull it
> from whatever static branch you put it into - up to you.
> Preferences?

Hi Al,

I am preparing a branch for you.
Will retest it and let you know once it is done.

Thanks!