Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753046AbXFCXKp (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:10:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751839AbXFCXKh (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:10:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:46927 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751730AbXFCXKh (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:10:37 -0400 Message-ID: <46634A2A.9060208@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:09:30 -0700 From: Ulrich Drepper Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Davide Libenzi CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap References: <4663067C.9050002@redhat.com> <466319DB.80800@redhat.com> <4663289D.5030109@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 774 Lines: 24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Davide Libenzi wrote: > Randomizing the base is not a problem. Should this be always, or flag > driven? I would say all the time. I don't think it's a problem with reproducibility in any reasonable code. - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGY0oq2ijCOnn/RHQRArmJAJ99Q0dLsPcnQQHjmSpLgv8va/F8/wCgyF06 57LVbqftsMC9x0/CzjWTgkw= =WXM6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/