Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 15:45:51 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
        German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>,
        Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>, Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>,
        Adam Li <adam.li@amperecomputing.com>,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/17] perf: Add SNOOP_PEER flag to perf mem data
 struct
Message-ID: <YthNXweIEdNfcoX1@kernel.org>
References: <20220604042820.2270916-1-leo.yan@linaro.org>
 <20220604042820.2270916-2-leo.yan@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220604042820.2270916-2-leo.yan@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

Em Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 12:28:04PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> From: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>
> 
> Add a flag to the perf mem data struct to signal that a request caused a
> cache-to-cache transfer of a line from a peer of the requestor and
> wasn't sourced from a lower cache level.  The line being moved from one
> peer cache to another has latency and performance implications. On Arm64
> Neoverse systems the data source can indicate a cache-to-cache transfer
> but not if the line is dirty or clean, so instead of overloading HITM
> define a new flag that indicates this type of transfer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain<kjain@linux.ibm.com>

Hey, any knews about this going upstream? PeterZ?

- Arnaldo

> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index d37629dbad72..7b88bfd097dc 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@ union perf_mem_data_src {
>  #define PERF_MEM_SNOOP_SHIFT	19
>  
>  #define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_FWD	0x01 /* forward */
> -/* 1 free */
> +#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_PEER	0x02 /* xfer from peer */
>  #define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_SHIFT  38
>  
>  /* locked instruction */
> -- 
> 2.25.1

-- 

- Arnaldo