Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp5910325imw; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 15:28:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1umVxEWwev31vk9HdbeCiZP322okVtkBzkSy859q8VCpiVchVny4VKz1qsZh6X7iGFu3IsI X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1485:b0:1ec:788e:a053 with SMTP id k5-20020a17090a148500b001ec788ea053mr7674392pja.16.1658356095139; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 15:28:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1658356095; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fPHoc8069kcsUvYd3h9Kdo6FgNELsYtGCOL0ZDTZRNq13Na9yAm/7eBzFQV6yIQOVF FwCl6Q377v899+6smVkoU/RARMZQL9Zf/Lf1H175s0iL0Bq5crU8PV2ypdifjOntTUoZ mWdBcIed1Wi8wluKDFshAMLpiWPSdDyNpc3bbMnEtxlUaFOLKNoTpx8yV4ICZZogOdv3 7SckXT481J3CWZ79cFIsPpGVd/SfGNQsqNAQlAYSC9ft378PvX2lX9/Rpcpdwxt2h+Ed Xk9fIPUhpm6hVs5Av9UTFwM8oMEO5zj/x/irAwj3wW8pNU667PU8VsFMzOwFJp9Lwjoj AMIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=L/R2XQTq8UfQ4+YMCQQ2OGIBescpZ4VOItV2YTfGyJw=; b=eFDafWQesgkgH6o6tWdO3zeB9KThydxrPRelivXvn1hha6z7PgL+/i9tFen/B7Xe9i k7FOBQKwE8SdAEYYNEwJv9oHCLF/4+U783HBE5alt+Fr7DHNe62INRKL694iSGPUgDNe JKTBFah5wAoG+uZgnuy3KfQWG+Yjx749+7RB1eWyNW/UUMFmgLfOI0rndmdGvZYgJUAR ldJrK2zRRWB/c/JgZwsh/rS869K8cTtDNr68MbFPbTTLCz0jMQC10ONwuKSLZR2/FI/i UMy1T2BewMjARWFJ2uuMIGI8/j+lAfmQ7eLoJdawftJAvZQgYS3lXKMbym65jUAqMWXR K2ww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="rH/cEngX"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id me14-20020a17090b17ce00b001f0532f5510si4612399pjb.23.2022.07.20.15.28.00; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 15:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="rH/cEngX"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229532AbiGTWGJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 Jul 2022 18:06:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47116 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230106AbiGTWGG (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2022 18:06:06 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35F92422DB; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 15:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACEA7B82220; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F105BC341C7; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:05:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1658354760; bh=qYViTxSdzdo85TRjxcG0IeVUNVFx1NYEZydO+uq4vs0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=rH/cEngXsM5vG3FeARaAn+VpgiODrGvNEsYBjPBEEZsWiDRBuoUFwIbYVS2BWk41q p7V5o0O/kvHoiPhiCTDabYy7EJhDCWaRgmnfM9pI0jdsTV9kGU786tpttATFol5Oa2 PqoPA44LabkGXX4G0PMMkHFJh8RFiWIijX+ywehOBSy7Khs1oFmDJoLzk+n6ffneEg KDEg1zCVgJjqY461V6vjaeA0ydqk89Vgf3x/2F0KnHm4G5C6AyFws8xor1z74o29KJ DhY1nxzPp2j4bBXjEnWNJWfkGi5kJ2pBu9f+JJqQUwtw+OEADs96/rZTi1TKbpfDoQ D4LQibpCeRBBQ== Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:05:58 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Jim Quinlan Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Cyril Brulebois , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Florian Fainelli , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Rob Herring , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" , "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] PCI: brcmstb: Add "refusal mode" to preclude PCIe-induced CPU aborts Message-ID: <20220720220558.GA1661469@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220716222454.29914-4-jim2101024@gmail.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 06:24:50PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > Our PCIe RC HW has an atypical behavior: if it does not have PCIe link > established between itself and downstream, any subsequent config space > access causes a CPU abort. This commit sets a "refusal mode" if the PCIe > link-up fails, and this has our pci_ops map_bus function returning a NULL > address, which in turn precludes the access from happening. > > Right now, "refusal mode" is window dressing. It will become relevant > in a future commit when brcm_pcie_start_link() is invoked during > enumeration instead of before it. > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan > --- > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c > index c026446d5830..72219a4f3964 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c > @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ struct brcm_pcie { > u32 hw_rev; > void (*perst_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val); > void (*bridge_sw_init_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val); > + bool refusal_mode; > }; > > static inline bool is_bmips(const struct brcm_pcie *pcie) > @@ -687,6 +688,19 @@ static void __iomem *brcm_pcie_map_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, > if (pci_is_root_bus(bus)) > return PCI_SLOT(devfn) ? NULL : base + where; > > + if (pcie->refusal_mode) { > + /* > + * At this point we do not have PCIe link-up. If there is > + * a config read or write access besides those targeting > + * the host bridge, our PCIe HW throws a CPU abort. To > + * prevent this we return the NULL address. The calling > + * functions -- pci_generic_config_*() -- will notice this > + * and not perform the access, and if it is a read access, > + * 0xffffffff is returned. > + */ > + return NULL; > + } Is this any different from all the other .map_bus() implementations that return NULL when the link is down? cdns_pci_map_bus() dw_pcie_other_conf_map_bus() nwl_pcie_map_bus() (see nwl_pcie_valid_device()) xilinx_pcie_map_bus() (see xilinx_pcie_valid_device()) If you can implement this the same way, i.e., using brcm_pcie_link_up(), it would be nice. > /* For devices, write to the config space index register */ > idx = PCIE_ECAM_OFFSET(bus->number, devfn, 0); > writel(idx, pcie->base + PCIE_EXT_CFG_INDEX); > @@ -704,6 +718,11 @@ static void __iomem *brcm_pcie_map_conf32(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devf > if (pci_is_root_bus(bus)) > return PCI_SLOT(devfn) ? NULL : base + (where & ~0x3); > > + if (pcie->refusal_mode) { > + /* See note above in brcm_pcie_map_conf() */ > + return NULL; > + } > + > /* For devices, write to the config space index register */ > idx = PCIE_ECAM_OFFSET(bus->number, devfn, (where & ~3)); > writel(idx, base + IDX_ADDR(pcie)); > @@ -989,6 +1008,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_start_link(struct brcm_pcie *pcie) > dev_err(dev, "link down\n"); > return -ENODEV; > } > + pcie->refusal_mode = false; > > if (!brcm_pcie_rc_mode(pcie)) { > dev_err(dev, "PCIe misconfigured; is in EP mode\n"); > @@ -1134,6 +1154,8 @@ static void brcm_pcie_turn_off(struct brcm_pcie *pcie) > void __iomem *base = pcie->base; > int tmp; > > + pcie->refusal_mode = true; > + > if (brcm_pcie_link_up(pcie)) > brcm_pcie_enter_l23(pcie); > /* Assert fundamental reset */ > @@ -1185,6 +1207,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev) > u32 tmp; > int ret; > > + pcie->refusal_mode = true; > base = pcie->base; > ret = clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk); > if (ret) > @@ -1361,6 +1384,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > pcie->type = data->type; > pcie->perst_set = data->perst_set; > pcie->bridge_sw_init_set = data->bridge_sw_init_set; > + pcie->refusal_mode = true; > > pcie->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); > if (IS_ERR(pcie->base)) > -- > 2.17.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel