Received: by 2002:ac0:da4c:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a12csp76090imi; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:30:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uc/zyCwduf2Ewq9clS1BASr4spwVJSsOAyVBOeMZCuLHOtplOdBxFX9xlFq1Brf+r/uvkh X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:106:b0:715:7cdf:400f with SMTP id 6-20020a170906010600b007157cdf400fmr38265548eje.1.1658363439427; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:30:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1658363439; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RAKFgv/2F/JDV3YwwYQAxIi1onG2mjXAYQpmLAST0ar40hXHU1BFbDmc3l5hBHyVFa Tfnt4PcD8rE6wx0VtiYZRd+Im7GpIqLvRboHtoOaUfxWIYeVncqfJnigF9O1ryYNpVXW v92CvUE7XeV3UTAvU/xHWSqPf2dzFUC8qmlFhUOUx8VboflC+GHROxgE19CBfA9nvQdC B3Dl9kJqyRdxEz/rtHiK9ZhEqiXxcPAea3Wl24fLQRhjnK3Tw6nLcSwPBSOAZLj6+uGJ aeCvY56beBr4SliX36tfwq04ODXqSa3VtxFRSf4I2A6DURjccXPasiYbw1b77+8M2M0n McFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ig9etYs538yPyN0CS13kIWTj1dEohsXUW+9HS4HPo3k=; b=zphtDXU/EckEMQ/BK3R045vbOSp/WUOTL1s+I4mSVjMzN8QM3SxMlwZC8fpHMGiQnA PbWUhTWzGe+NOaBjcmjAzF1QWOLVxze9kVYmKebXfhaUr2Ejhw+FSzQxgP9kugHYOmJ/ gHttZJ1j/HKDToygOxnfNfrVBQGNK5O1rZ6MZ/vpEjfCctptgrs0L/WYlKtTlcHrzx3h cSWgA4OHP7s+Opf3AMBkZNzLdgAA3WTLz3ZZ+WFEqAAgjYe3ZexoOBEuaKsxTee2r9cL TYqtewObpx3e5w1tn3051tTpFqF+OMt1Nsvjmhh14HiXtLsakvMNTgETAJ2eaoYogvCM /rIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=gyDY7jz0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d19-20020a170906041300b0072b8cd4ca77si691332eja.274.2022.07.20.17.30.13; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=gyDY7jz0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230105AbiGUASu (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 Jul 2022 20:18:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53728 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229902AbiGUASs (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2022 20:18:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38DDD74DEF for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id p8so275671plq.13 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:18:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ig9etYs538yPyN0CS13kIWTj1dEohsXUW+9HS4HPo3k=; b=gyDY7jz0AD9dFRGWwEJCRI/go3GcSEHRKwgo5EdQEchrF1KA6LPmPykKEd3/XJyvlC Dlu0pQQg41Sxxu/L27+OU2y6sjm3m60xmPQgsNVsaIWejgwokxQK9+HIIcSvPlKh3tMp FEFgm9tDyUM3rtzUwuNkhe7whyrohBSC2sgEemMhYuG0uxwz3I5CSl7jONrUt1UFe7wH xZIkpOUf1oUa6fGVQIl6K16KCWU5YH9VopjsNST+utp05LVXTjhdxIzpsV6tNbY4RGnt lNo8ETJDezHxvbz1B9WY8tKLGrW+0jYOj4xJKWWTPGgE+E53gddde7/6NwbeEjLFeYic qiKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ig9etYs538yPyN0CS13kIWTj1dEohsXUW+9HS4HPo3k=; b=NLeD1aTtywM9lvvXgI2s/NzVBBoAKgNoF29NBN1rYVkl6KqPGPDYshw2LEI9G4YP5K 4CdOfQEcqZlt2VUTtpvu3S3KX5DRJQ/yDskaUMX7DROFP8rAVy4+B/Z6r5ZEsvJLaDB3 /+N/ozyrWs0WHkXayGCx+JYeLFWxASoEfXWWgsNmK9g12V1+JzCLgIMZZLQQIdMzj1rn T4zS7h1WmWSodwdj5p0QwcosydlG1qUdAM57cBxuJZw7d3T7IPh3pJVUEavJ03trpPv8 zfqukvBgrDPHMvnlF1LsLm2n0Mie+156qBaWYcWt5pwOd1yHs3FL+hQgbrFAxG3QhkNa kRwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8bUqhQ2pUWI/0CMsNxeKuxfA1J8Z98vtNwMUK2RalUU+E0O8hA a2IpzTDPCI5kiCgcnT4ARRcHuQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:33cd:b0:1f0:3655:17a8 with SMTP id lk13-20020a17090b33cd00b001f0365517a8mr8186696pjb.33.1658362726524; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (123.65.230.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.230.65.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p7-20020a170902780700b0016beceac426sm152831pll.138.2022.07.20.17.18.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:18:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:18:42 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Maxim Levitsky Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Kees Cook , Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , Joerg Roedel , Ingo Molnar , Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Gleixner , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: x86: SVM: use smram structs Message-ID: References: <20220621150902.46126-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com> <20220621150902.46126-11-mlevitsk@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220621150902.46126-11-mlevitsk@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > This removes the last user of put_smstate/GET_SMSTATE so > remove these functions as well. > > Also add a sanity check that we don't attempt to enter the SMM > on non long mode capable guest CPU with a running nested guest. > > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ------ > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++----------- > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 1038ccb7056a39..9e8467be96b4e6 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -2057,12 +2057,6 @@ static inline int kvm_cpu_get_apicid(int mps_cpu) > #endif > } > > -#define put_smstate(type, buf, offset, val) \ > - *(type *)((buf) + (offset) - 0x7e00) = val > - > -#define GET_SMSTATE(type, buf, offset) \ > - (*(type *)((buf) + (offset) - 0x7e00)) > - > int kvm_cpu_dirty_log_size(void); > > int memslot_rmap_alloc(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned long npages); > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > index 136298cfb3fb57..8dcbbe839bef36 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > @@ -4399,6 +4399,7 @@ static int svm_smi_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection) > > static int svm_enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *smstate) > { > + struct kvm_smram_state_64 *smram = (struct kvm_smram_state_64 *)smstate; > struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu); > struct kvm_host_map map_save; > int ret; > @@ -4406,10 +4407,17 @@ static int svm_enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *smstate) > if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu)) > return 0; > > - /* FED8h - SVM Guest */ > - put_smstate(u64, smstate, 0x7ed8, 1); > - /* FEE0h - SVM Guest VMCB Physical Address */ > - put_smstate(u64, smstate, 0x7ee0, svm->nested.vmcb12_gpa); > + /* > + * 32 bit SMRAM format doesn't preserve EFER and SVM state. > + * SVM should not be enabled by the userspace without marking > + * the CPU as at least long mode capable. > + */ > + > + if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SVM)) > + return 1; Isn't this is an independent bug fix? I.e. should be in its own patch? > + > + smram->svm_guest_flag = 1; > + smram->svm_guest_vmcb_gpa = svm->nested.vmcb12_gpa; > > svm->vmcb->save.rax = vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX]; > svm->vmcb->save.rsp = vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP];