Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 18:33:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 18:33:30 -0500 Received: from sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.163.11]:38910 "EHLO sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 18:33:15 -0500 Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 15:32:28 -0800 (PST) From: Gideon Glass To: Richard Russon cc: "Eric S. Raymond" , lkml Subject: Re: esr cut off my genitives In-Reply-To: <1007229787.2134.10.camel@addlestones> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1 Dec 2001, Richard Russon wrote: > Hi esr, > > There are a couple of lines of the patch I'm not quite happy with. > > > -Windows' Logical Disk Manager (Dynamic Disk) support (EXPERIMENTAL) > > +Windows Logical Disk Manager (Dynamic Disk) support (EXPERIMENTAL) > > > -Windows' LDM extra logging > > +Windows LDM extra logging > > Not wishing to sound too pedantic, but I did put the apostropes in on > purpose. "Windows" is a plural noun and the genitive of it is "Windows'". If you really want to get pedantic.. "windows" is a plural noun, but "Windows" is a singular proper noun, and in "Windows LDM" it functions as an adjective. Using possessive here is confusing because it suggests that this feature belongs to Windows, or that it's part of Windows itself, but obviously it isn't (the feature being referred to is part of Linux). It is only *related* to Windows, so the adjectival "Windows" is the best thing to use. > > Of course if it's a limitation of the new config tool I'll understand :-) > (and you'll need to apply the following, too). > > -IBM's S/390 architecture > +IBMs S/390 architecture The "IBMs" plural construction is wrong since there is only one IBM. "IBMs" can't be possessive because there is no reason not to use an apostrophe to indicate possessive in this case. Note that "IBM S/390 architecture" could be used, with "IBM" (a noun) functioning as an adjective in the same manner as "Windows" above. However, expressing the notion of ownership/control ("IBM's") conveys more information then mere association ("IBM"), so "IBM's" seems preferable here. gid > > Cheers, > FlatCap (Rich) > ldm@flatcap.org > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/