Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:06:33 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
        Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        "Abhinav Kumar (QUIC)" <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
        "Aravind Venkateswaran (QUIC)" <quic_aravindh@quicinc.com>,
        Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>,
        freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 0/3] eDP/DP Phy vdda realted function
Message-ID: <Ytl5icJyICD1fbzP@sirena.org.uk>
References: <1657038556-2231-1-git-send-email-quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>
 <YtkrDcjTGhpaU1e0@hovoldconsulting.com>
 <CAA8EJprQnnWjDZJy9+zUBsVQCi3jtc0Ngtzzk9MXpwOvuAS68g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD=FV=W0m-x9JC=5hQ3urSNmUp8sY-u8YkNd66yrKfRNAH4rcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YtlrV5R+JMxb7Dlu@sirena.org.uk>
 <CAD=FV=XDOxy1R5ipD0errwi6GOFz-X6G3_WE34LGLqmWE6_iyw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="797VOFF2drkIGdfE"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=XDOxy1R5ipD0errwi6GOFz-X6G3_WE34LGLqmWE6_iyw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk


--797VOFF2drkIGdfE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 08:43:48AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:

> I guess I'd put it this way, though: how many drivers in Linux today
> have _two_ calls to regulator_set_load(): one for the "active" state
> and one for the retention state. Looks like UFS maybe. Any others? For
> most devices the pattern is:

Oh, I'm not saying there's sensible implementations in drivers.  In
general I'd say that as with voltage if a driver is not actively
managing the load during runtime it should not be setting it at all, one
time configuration should be left to the constraints if it's needed.

--797VOFF2drkIGdfE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmLZeYgACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9Bitwf/T7m2MuB1BDNcYxER8zA/bmfsSd02RVjQBt889bIiIQndg6hsiAsYJDzL
YiHt3f0B5VwYWEYQ7qHJJNv2XTnkLyck+/KrZy9mzJifwbD9JuozXIquclLzsUse
NP5zX0uDOJBsNX23i0B/d6R650tJvYSHY3++cxMkHCPFxL7VgB/meefwMrpPdNAJ
DMSiihQNvJRcI8c+Iy41pA4lRJaEl6EG/B3my5nFYsj8+guxaNkLkIpWt8dq2VMl
a6jslx3UiscBq9BxK3MCAvhLON57wr9nnKlFJfaheIqqn1bXKYQ+ufJX2YxPpyXI
1WmQBt54MQiyiEAO777PA6jPhC021Q==
=HOZd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--797VOFF2drkIGdfE--