Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 21 Jul 2022 20:37:14 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/231] 5.18.13-rc1 review
Message-ID: <Ytmc2t8FnbwAVMKU@kroah.com>
References: <1ca489cc-491d-f78f-5743-fd47d6c98efb@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1ca489cc-491d-f78f-5743-fd47d6c98efb@gmx.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 05:33:48PM +0200, Ronald Warsow wrote:
> hallo Greg
> 
> 5.18.13-rc1
> 
> compiles here with a lot of warnings on an x86_64
> (Intel i5-11400, Fedora 36)
> 
> warnings all over the tree like this:
> ...
> arch/x86/crypto/twofish-x86_64-asm_64.o: warning: objtool:
> twofish_enc_blk()+0x7b2: 'naked' return found in RETPOLINE build
> arch/x86/crypto/twofish-x86_64-asm_64.o: warning: objtool:
> twofish_dec_blk()+0x7b2: 'naked' return found in RETPOLINE build
> ...
> 
> patch was applied to an clean 5.18.12
> 
> is it just me ?

Should now be resolved in -rc3.  If not, please let me know.