Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc:     linux@armlinux.org.uk, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm: add definition of arch_irq_work_raise()
Date:   Thu, 21 Jul 2022 22:17:27 +0100
Message-Id: <20220721211729.451731-2-ben-linux@fluff.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220721211729.451731-1-ben-linux@fluff.org>
References: <20220721211729.451731-1-ben-linux@fluff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

The arm <asm/irq_work.h> does not define arch_irq_work_raise()
so is triggering the following sparse warning. Add a definiton
to fix this:

kernel/irq_work.c:70:13: warning: symbol 'arch_irq_work_raise' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/kernel/smp.c:582:6: warning: symbol 'arch_irq_work_raise' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
index 8895999834cc..3149e4dc1b54 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
@@ -9,4 +9,6 @@ static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
 	return is_smp();
 }
 
+extern void arch_irq_work_raise(void);
+
 #endif /* _ASM_ARM_IRQ_WORK_H */
-- 
2.35.1