Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <98623d02-cde4-b036-a85c-9325b58c7eab@quicinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Jul 2022 15:13:17 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] usb: dwc3: Allow end transfer commands to be sent
 during soft disconnect
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
        "balbi@kernel.org" <balbi@kernel.org>,
        "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        "quic_jackp@quicinc.com" <quic_jackp@quicinc.com>
References: <20220713003523.29309-1-quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>
 <20220713003523.29309-5-quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>
 <d8d26ce3-6773-bd9c-e227-0924f239eae0@synopsys.com>
From:   Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <d8d26ce3-6773-bd9c-e227-0924f239eae0@synopsys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Thinh,

On 7/21/2022 3:08 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Wesley,
> 
> On 7/12/2022, Wesley Cheng wrote:
>> If soft disconnect is in progress, allow the endxfer command to be sent,
>> without this, there is an issue where the stop active transfer call
>> (during pullup disable) wouldn't actually issue the endxfer command,
>> while clearing the DEP flag.
>>
>> In addition, if the DWC3_EP_DELAY_STOP flag was set before soft disconnect
>> started (i.e. from the dequeue path), ensure that when the EP0 transaction
>> completes during soft disconnect, to issue the endxfer with the force
>> parameter set, as it does not expect a command complete event.
>>
>> Fixes: e4cf6580ac740 ("usb: dwc3: gadget: Wait for ep0 xfers to complete during dequeue")
>> Suggested-by: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> Link:
>>     https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/1a1a5485-790e-79ce-f5a6-1e96d9b49a47@synopsys.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!cXW2TlALYWnXNPg-NoMFUrQ8K1egEZiQizZ5CA1DOM1Gcw4tfOULy-_2eMGvL8pQPte5dScFON-0wxH2eXu8ijEQUbs$
>>
>>    drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c    | 3 +--
>>    drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 5 ++++-
>>    2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
>> index 506ef717fdc0..5851b0e9db0a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
>> @@ -290,8 +290,7 @@ void dwc3_ep0_out_start(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>>    		if (!(dwc3_ep->flags & DWC3_EP_DELAY_STOP))
>>    			continue;
>>    
>> -		dwc3_ep->flags &= ~DWC3_EP_DELAY_STOP;
> 
> If we don't clear this flag here,
> 

This is why I added the dwc->connected argument to control the 
"interrupt" argument.

>> -		dwc3_stop_active_transfer(dwc3_ep, true, true);
>> +		dwc3_stop_active_transfer(dwc3_ep, true, dwc->connected);
>>    	}
>>    }
>>    
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> index ee85b773e3fe..41b7007358de 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> @@ -1693,6 +1693,7 @@ static int __dwc3_stop_active_transfer(struct dwc3_ep *dep, bool force, bool int
>>    		dep->flags &= ~DWC3_EP_TRANSFER_STARTED;
>>    	else if (!ret)
>>    		dep->flags |= DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING;
>> +	dep->flags &= ~DWC3_EP_DELAY_STOP;
>>    
>>    	return ret;
>>    }
>> @@ -3686,8 +3687,10 @@ void dwc3_stop_active_transfer(struct dwc3_ep *dep, bool force,
>>    	if (dep->number <= 1 && dwc->ep0state != EP0_DATA_PHASE)
>>    		return;
>>    
>> +	if (interrupt && (dep->flags & DWC3_EP_DELAY_STOP))
>> +		return;
>> +
> 
> then it may not go through here. I think I made this same mistake in my
> previous suggestion.
> 

Since dwc->connected is set to FALSE before we call stop active 
transfers, if we ever run into a situation where delayed stop is set 
already, then it should go through.

Thanks
Wesley Cheng