Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757375AbXFDQBS (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:01:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755075AbXFDQBK (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:01:10 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]:32811 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755017AbXFDQBI (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:01:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=l3RvfykleHUri7ar0hC7++CoeIejYHrmK8VYLK+n8ZjP5rJvHR5UbBX6LE3MckKh7h52pAiIKh/3C9OX31KXqUVQrT1xsdaoB1lbw1O/3kogTvVi388VWUveiJcQ2GYzYB0n6rFFMob6UUn3Zi5VNqU5B1ZpLnhO3ikaCIG1JVw= Message-ID: <2c0942db0706040901n473afb20x800cb489e3f7732b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:01:06 -0700 From: "Ray Lee" To: "Justin Piszcz" Subject: Re: Intel's response Linux/MTRR/8GB Memory Support / Why doesn't the kernel realize the BIOS has problems and re-map appropriately? Cc: "Jesse Barnes" , "Matt Keenan" , "Andi Kleen" , "Venki Pallipadi" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4662869A.9030700@gmail.com> <200706040840.21593.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> <2c0942db0706040848y1d1c2ce9p521c65117244edf1@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1c72fef7f5d08a66 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1069 Lines: 24 On 6/4/07, Justin Piszcz wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Ray Lee wrote: > > Ick. Systems that used to boot fine would then panic on a kernel > > upgrade. That's rather rude for a condition that's merely an > > optimization (using all memory), rather than one of correctness. A > > panic seems entirely inappropriate. > > While I am unsure of the 'best' solution, if they boot and it does not > panic but takes 10 minutes to boot, people are going to seriously wonder > what is going on? Oh, hmm. I think a big fat warning with asterisks in the bootup is a good thing, but panicking when there's no need is never a good idea. If the system takes that long to boot up, I'm certain the first thing they'll do is to type dmesg | less to look for anomalies. Ray - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/