Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <62ddd3db.1c69fb81.d8b0f.a851@mx.google.com>
Date:   Sun, 24 Jul 2022 22:49:41 +0200
From:   Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 01/14] net: dsa: qca8k: cache match data to
 speed up access
References: <20220723141845.10570-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20220723141845.10570-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20220723141845.10570-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20220723141845.10570-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20220724223031.2ceczkbov6bcgrtq@skbuf>
 <62ddce96.1c69fb81.fdc52.a203@mx.google.com>
 <20220724230626.rzynvd2pxdcd2z3r@skbuf>
 <62ddd221.1c69fb81.95457.a4ee@mx.google.com>
 <20220724231843.kokvexqptpj4eaao@skbuf>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220724231843.kokvexqptpj4eaao@skbuf>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 02:18:43AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:42:20PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Sure, it was just a stupid idea to set everything not strictly neeeded
> > only after verifying that we have a correct switch... But it doesn't
> > make sense as qca8k_priv is freed anyway if that's the case.
> 
> I don't understand what you're saying. With your proposed logic,
> of_device_get_match_data() will be called anyway in qca8k_read_switch_id(),
> and if the switch id is valid, it will be called once more in qca8k_sw_probe().
> With my proposed logic, of_device_get_match_data() will be called exactly
> once, to populate priv->info *before* the first instance of when it's
> going to be needed.

Just ignore... it's me trying to give a reason for my broken logic.

-- 
	Ansuel