Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:50:50 +0200
From:   Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
To:     "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc:     shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
        festevam@gmail.com, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>, linux-imx@nxp.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: imx: imx93-blk-ctrl: set priority level
Message-ID: <20220725085050.izj7kmgeuxxug6rh@pengutronix.de>
References: <20220725035931.3988435-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220725035931.3988435-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Precedence: bulk

Hi Peng,

thanks for the patch.

On 22-07-25, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> i.MX93 mediamix blk ctrl has registers to set QoS(priority) value.
> It support default QoS value and cfg QoS value. Set an initial
> value from i.MX design team. If LCDIF/ISI/PXP wanna a different QoS
> value in future, they could use interconnect to request bandwidth.

I need to ask here. Does the iMX93 use the same interconnect as the
iMX8M* does?

Regards,
  Marco