Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 25 Jul 2022 13:07:00 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To:     Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, dsahern@kernel.org,
        stephen@networkplumber.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        pabeni@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, leon@kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
        Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
        Andrew Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] devlink: introduce framework for
 selftests
Message-ID: <Yt55VKOYmn/dF4Ob@nanopsycho>
References: <20220723042206.8104-1-vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>
 <20220723042206.8104-2-vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>
 <20220723091600.1277e903@kernel.org>
 <Yt5L8TbzTwthnrl7@nanopsycho>
 <CAHLZf_uWxnS5Voc6h7pnS=dRq96JV1wq9zVXKhVbyrRva9=b0g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHLZf_uWxnS5Voc6h7pnS=dRq96JV1wq9zVXKhVbyrRva9=b0g@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:48:39AM CEST, vikas.gupta@broadcom.com wrote:
>Hi Jiri,
>
>On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 1:23 PM Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
>>
>> Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 06:16:00PM CEST, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>> >On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:52:05 +0530 Vikas Gupta wrote:
>> >> +enum devlink_attr_selftest_test_id {
>> >> +    DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_UNSPEC,
>> >> +    DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_FLASH,    /* flag */
>> >> +
>> >> +    __DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_MAX,
>> >> +    DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_MAX = __DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_MAX - 1
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +enum devlink_selftest_test_status {
>> >> +    DEVLINK_SELFTEST_TEST_STATUS_SKIP,
>> >> +    DEVLINK_SELFTEST_TEST_STATUS_PASS,
>> >> +    DEVLINK_SELFTEST_TEST_STATUS_FAIL
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +enum devlink_attr_selftest_result {
>> >> +    DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_UNSPEC,
>> >> +    DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT,                   /* nested */
>> >> +    DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_TEST_ID,           /* u32,
>> >> +                                                     * enum devlink_attr_selftest_test_id
>> >> +                                                     */
>> >> +    DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_TEST_STATUS,       /* u8,
>> >> +                                                     * enum devlink_selftest_test_status
>> >> +                                                     */
>> >> +
>> >> +    __DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_MAX,
>> >> +    DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_MAX = __DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_MAX - 1
>> >
>> >Any thoughts on running:
>> >
>> >       sed -i '/_SELFTEST/ {s/_TEST_/_/g}' $patch
>>
>> Sure, why not. But please make sure you keep all other related things
>> (variables, cmdline opts) consistent.
>>
>> Thanks!
>Does the 'test_id' in command line
> 'devlink dev selftests run DEV test_id flash'
>will still hold good if DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_TEST_ID changes
>to DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_ID ?
>or it should be
>'devlink dev selftests run DEV selftest_id flash' ?

Just "id". Thanks!


>
>Thanks,
>Vikas
>
>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >on this patch? For example DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_TEST_STATUS
>> >is 40 characters long, ain't nobody typing that, and _TEST is repeated..
>> >
>> >Otherwise LGTM!