Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:21:44 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@semihalf.com>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix speed setting for
 CPU/DSA ports
Message-ID: <20220725122144.bdiup756mgquae3n@skbuf>
References: <20220714010021.1786616-1-mw@semihalf.com>
 <20220724233807.bthah6ctjadl35by@skbuf>
 <CAPv3WKdFNOPRg45TiJuAVuxM0LjEnB0qZH70J1rMenJs7eBJzw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPv3WKdFNOPRg45TiJuAVuxM0LjEnB0qZH70J1rMenJs7eBJzw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 02:18:45AM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> I can of course apply both suggestions, however, I am wondering if I
> should resend them at all, as Russell's series is still being
> discussed. IMO it may be worth waiting whether it makes it before the
> merge window - if not, I can resend this patch after v5.20-rc1,
> targetting the net branch. What do you think?

I just don't want a fix for a known regression to slip through the cracks.
You can resend whenever you consider, but I believe that if you do so now
(today or in the following few days), you won't conflict with anybody's work,
considering that this has been said:

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:57:20PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Well, at this point, I'm just going to give up with this kernel cycle.
> It seems impossible to get this sorted. It seems impossible to move
> forward with the conversion of Marvell DSA to phylink_pcs.