Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S282812AbRLBHr7>; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 02:47:59 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S282813AbRLBHrt>; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 02:47:49 -0500
Received: from queen.bee.lk ([203.143.12.182]:36242 "EHLO queen.bee.lk")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S282812AbRLBHrj>;
	Sun, 2 Dec 2001 02:47:39 -0500
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 13:23:13 +0600
From: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@gnu.org>
To: "Elgar, Jeremy" <JElgar@ndsuk.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Mixing Patches: pre-emptive + xfs
Message-ID: <20011202132313.A5555@bee.lk>
In-Reply-To: <F128989C2E99D4119C110002A507409801C53035@topper.hrow.ndsuk.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <F128989C2E99D4119C110002A507409801C53035@topper.hrow.ndsuk.com>; from JElgar@ndsuk.com on Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:13:33AM -0000
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:13:33AM -0000, Elgar, Jeremy wrote:
>
> Just wondering if anyone has try using these two patches together (or is this
> a really bad idea)

I run xfs+preempt on a headless firewall machine for quite some time without
any appearent problem.

Cheers,

Anuradha

-- 

Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.16)

Your true value depends entirely on what you are compared with.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/