Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1762333AbXFECEo@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1762333AbXFECEo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:04:44 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756748AbXFECEg
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:04:36 -0400
Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:52235 "EHLO
	smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756218AbXFECEf (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:04:35 -0400
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:03:40 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, devel@openvz.org,
       linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>,
       adilger@clusterfs.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH ext3/ext4] orphan list corruption due bad inode
Message-Id: <20070604190340.dba85bb0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <4663A0CE.102@sw.ru>
References: <4663A0CE.102@sw.ru>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 3130
Lines: 74

On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:19:10 +0400 Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru> wrote:

> After ext3 orphan list check has been added into ext3_destroy_inode() (please see my previous patch) the following situation has been detected:
>  EXT3-fs warning (device sda6): ext3_unlink: Deleting nonexistent file (37901290), 0
>  Inode 00000101a15b7840: orphan list check failed!
>  00000773 6f665f00 74616d72 00000573 65725f00 06737270 66000000 616d726f
> ...
>  Call Trace: [<ffffffff80211ea9>] ext3_destroy_inode+0x79/0x90
>   [<ffffffff801a2b16>] sys_unlink+0x126/0x1a0
>   [<ffffffff80111479>] error_exit+0x0/0x81
>   [<ffffffff80110aba>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
> 
> First messages said that unlinked inode has i_nlink=0, then ext3_unlink() adds this inode into orphan list.
> 
> Second message means that this inode has not been removed from orphan list. Inode dump has showed that i_fop = &bad_file_ops and it can be set in make_bad_inode() only. Then I've found that ext3_read_inode() can call make_bad_inode() without any error/warning messages, for example in the following case:
> ...
>         if (inode->i_nlink == 0) {
>                 if (inode->i_mode == 0 ||
>                     !(EXT3_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_mount_state & EXT3_ORPHAN_FS)) {
>                         /* this inode is deleted */
>                         brelse (bh);
>                         goto bad_inode;
> ...
> 
> Bad inode can live some time, ext3_unlink can add it to orphan list, but
> ext3_delete_inode() do not deleted this inode from orphan list. As
> result we can have orphan list corruption detected in ext3_destroy_inode().
> 
> However it is not clear for me how to fix this issue correctly.
> 
> As far as i see is_bad_inode() is called after iget() in all places excluding ext3_lookup() and ext3_get_parent(). I believe it makes sense to add bad inode check to these functions too and call iput if bad inode detected.

Please avoid the 500-column paragraphs?

> Signed-off-by:	Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext3/namei.c b/fs/ext3/namei.c
> index 9bb046d..e3ac8c3 100644
> --- a/fs/ext3/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext3/namei.c
> @@ -1019,6 +1019,11 @@ static struct dentry *ext3_lookup(struct inode * dir, struct dentry *dentry, str
>  
>  		if (!inode)
>  			return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
> +
> +		if (is_bad_inode(inode)) {
> +			iput(inode);
> +			return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);	
> +		}
>  	}
>  	return d_splice_alias(inode, dentry);
>  }
> @@ -1054,6 +1059,11 @@ struct dentry *ext3_get_parent(struct dentry *child)
>  	if (!inode)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
>  
> +	if (is_bad_inode(inode)) {
> +		iput(inode);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);	
> +	}
> +
>  	parent = d_alloc_anon(inode);
>  	if (!parent) {
>  		iput(inode);

Seems reasonable.  So this prevents the bad inodes from getting onto the
orphan list in the first place?

What caused those inodes to be bad, anyway?  Memory allocation failures?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/