Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:07:40 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc:     krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, shawnguo@kernel.org,
        s.hauer@pengutronix.de, aisheng.dong@nxp.com, festevam@gmail.com,
        ping.bai@nxp.com, kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-imx@nxp.com,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: imx: use minItems
Message-ID: <20220725200740.GA2610621-robh@kernel.org>
References: <20220723094335.3577048-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220723094335.3577048-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 05:43:26PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> There are many warnings when do dtbs_check: fsl,pins are too long,
> so add minItems to address that.

A single cell is not valid though, right?

This particular property is problematic because each entry depending 
on the platform has different number of cells (5, 6, etc.). A single 
cell (minItems: 1) is not valid though, right?

There's a fix in dtschema min branch which should fix the warnings. 
Unfortunately, it just strips any bounds checking.

Rob