Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220721093422.2173982-1-marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VddBhc9peHXfNfTyTNni246kC8CyLqCrMFadn67LGDarQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdaczrU1tM5Yt7P-Q2h+ge8STOi6HvvYeTM-g+JwS8_gZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VfaExrFYto7LWa5Vnbm6JbiAqtutKmk0HzfeHmmi3PwOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdYHgD-fmt_2PWJrmyGY=AOP0Z+4jTkH=n3wJ+a0aApqcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHp75Vf_aDSocdB7R6zKFwEOBRwq0w2m6GdCM-5ujKoz4bGiqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdbTypeq0M8VNb491GaZdBLyE9_TFpCDn5omnTe8D+BU7w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHp75Vfrgkq+yTtFxjkvUMnVOHCL+VyHGXPn4BN7i6C1cA=Uuw@mail.gmail.com> <CACRpkdYHN3PPBb-=4MU1aTUxDvij_qeX4YkC9A28FQtUTvam0w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYHN3PPBb-=4MU1aTUxDvij_qeX4YkC9A28FQtUTvam0w@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:03:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeU8Jj5RjQ=8X+=F+=COoAjMgQT18DKJrSHn3972ct9Lw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: gpio-74x164: add support for CDx4HC4094
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:28 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:31 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's rather my common sense, because we have a clock here to shift a
> > register. It's kinda obvious *to me* that when we have a latch, that
> > latch shouldn't pass data on a level. Yes, there are buffers with
> > level strobe, but it's different. So, as I said, the oscilloscope can
> > finish our discussion one way or the other, but I believe it will be
> > my way ;) I will very (badly) surprised if it becomes your way. It
> > will ruin my beliefs in humanity. Not less.
>
> I think you are right Andy, I trust your judgement better than my own
> here for sure!

The true science when we put any statement in doubt and then go
step-by-step to prove it again. If this will be done successfully the
statement is correct. That said, thank you to put this in doubt, it's
appreciated!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko