Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add LLCC BWMON
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@quicinc.com>
References: <20220720192807.130098-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <20220720192807.130098-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <25673493-4171-62b0-f696-1316d115f388@kali.org>
 <96552a95-8939-3ac2-c9b3-14dabaf53923@linaro.org>
 <d814a6da-b0d7-2fd1-fd14-8f1f3b88666f@kali.org>
 <d89a540f-672d-83de-d19d-00f10e4370d1@kali.org>
 <fec6bd98-5efd-fe34-6d75-1765219acd82@linaro.org>
From:   Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
Message-ID: <25321f37-dbea-188b-1b11-e983a00701b2@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 17:01:59 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fec6bd98-5efd-fe34-6d75-1765219acd82@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 7/23/22 2:06 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/07/2022 04:37, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>>>
>>> Currently it's 5.19.0-rc7 (torvalds tree at 4ba1329c) with a few extra
>>> patches on top, the bwmon set included.  It's possible that secure
>>> world uses it, but I do not know enough about that to say one way or
>>> the other.
> 
> To test patches you should apply them on maintainer's tree or
> linux-next. Applying on other trees of course might be useful for
> testing some backports, but it is independent process and different issue.
> 
>>>
>>> -- steev
>>>
>> I think you may be right; I just applied this patchset to -next
>> (20220722) and i do not see the error message there.  On my 5.19-rc7
>> tree, i am also testing a patchset that enables qcom devices to access
>> efivars, so possibly we are ending up in secure world there?
> 
> Actually mapping of IO space should not touch secure world, so this was
> a long shot assuming you test it on the next.
> 

The memory region specified in device tree overlaps with the llcc system
cache controller node. Steev probably had the QCOM_LLCC config enabled 
when he tested it out on his branch.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>