Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:08:37 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [-next] Lockdep warnings
Message-ID: <20220726130837.n5734wq5jviocxsc@bogus>
References: <20220726104134.3b3awfphvafljdgp@bogus>
 <Yt/gyEMOtGafQX4z@FVFF77S0Q05N>
 <Yt/i/o3Sb+niH2e+@FVFF77S0Q05N>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Yt/i/o3Sb+niH2e+@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 01:50:06PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 01:40:40PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > [Adding Peter; I suspect this is due to the cpuidle rework]
> 
> Looking again I see the cpuidle rework isn't in next, so evidently not...
> 

Yes, that is the first thing I checked and saw it wasn't in next. The first
splat I had see 2 weeks ago seem to suggest something around context_tracking
patches in the -next but I no longer see that. I haven't spent time digging
this, so thought better to post the splat on the list in the meantime.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep