Received: by 2002:ac0:e34a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g10csp816236imn; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:03:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tcu1Q7esbTPDuTrN5+ZsZRvbWt06C38b4+l/YupcizlfqH7c4nYG2IhT3ZOENzMq56TEsM X-Received: by 2002:a67:f351:0:b0:358:3289:1c00 with SMTP id p17-20020a67f351000000b0035832891c00mr5285729vsm.40.1658855014923; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:03:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1658855014; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DzCti5JLeLuth2HhF0Zqacpc3aJRl270/s1LnFndtYN0uTbdznZQJOOf6q3pNGVf9M ZTBzmHC7mhgFJNcrE+5pYLekLWtRz/xwMK/W13U4NMealbGH19XangvODFPih4v5ErMR +NlKAIijIizNLC0Bo7nthWEv0WWQ7lax7e6wI7IpwLwAo4JV4BRolYm3+SYJ/tTC+GT8 dYGqw7bFoTutGtWFy/ZxitZsSxsr2zvY4rf1Lsm5xgkjPNTkZ5OviJfAyEybEPCmrpkw jM7UUOYd7w1rc4bh3xQAydLcd2CHy7Qq9cu7+HyvN87LCMP+qMiinfch2pa7Jcp5RtXz I6Uw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=fKj8dgHcggT1JGoGdo8pINpky6yVfRWlxcx9Yh8FHis=; b=swuAoQ2iA0IUPCXwCNh2sWUaatvIzt7O6cCpxi6iaetyCKSav/mG/qee5Y3JTiqhen pqenEzW8nPfhCGESFskdtsy7S72dFiC1OWPrnfirUc8mfYts+S5W5wYEhPOJCWDVGNcU sQMq8CfQf0A4jTzNBAxJoRpntSmgO9wxeq7GhSeR4mQeQzpZmMcPJN/u/iOsFCdbxpl7 VU+jVTWIrgHgxF2B007nudu4rsehhDNMZpgidCNCFaI67E6kmf7SUqp92dYSC+MnXTMk Hpo5oYIwJ3kuwuWfN8LfUy3XjgD0fewVnJW8R7PeAuEM+FvUYD50/VFVnIMbS6WWIPPd +83g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=LYvqNd8P; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b128-20020a1f1b86000000b003764f5fabbasi768477vkb.159.2022.07.26.10.03.17; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:03:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=LYvqNd8P; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234575AbiGZQsa (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:48:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57012 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233883AbiGZQs0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:48:26 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 160702559A for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id 17so13779925pfy.0 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:48:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fKj8dgHcggT1JGoGdo8pINpky6yVfRWlxcx9Yh8FHis=; b=LYvqNd8Pw2GjRpqFKhhDVjT3N42vTJNhx1cq9oezHPNC28iE+mb1s7azr0DqrUhjme frkc5wmvpngxW/7KsiB75MBeLW38gVyPWmNZgZT0oeQe3PhiOvKaOIJt2AX9/ADA3fr2 AMleKo/D61a5djIoc2UNVoHAcgSHCi8bBnkBvsvZT9vEo6Oq3BkkLRt21Tu8tiYt95XZ s2yE9nNfmaTanxTMSQDYvpTuAmSy/CvpNVR2kSEhjB2IVezy3ZBcCVF4Q+8YUmC0z2rY EoHhH/9zDGgDjHfATYO5TN+5oJEZWBqcZfQzDAxZdlOAxfmtHDwm0QrCo1nD+F8gtbkU eHMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fKj8dgHcggT1JGoGdo8pINpky6yVfRWlxcx9Yh8FHis=; b=cqZG2yHE9gBrqvcbhjbHrCrlBQBQPqf5qUCVabwHSPrwf/0lzGYh6W0lrx9Yxb3kUg KU67oavC61ucsqq0O3BbrcwJvYrCenoh8EXSb2kZSCnyqkTCPwHmN8lJ/4fO0IAbLWhn krzWTHF2y+I/iq3Ql7KZXOOVqgtip0Mo+zbEDZpc4HcljvuBfT+CL/tHZSOV9qvJYxpP hJcXcPFPomNR3/w/DmFcZaU05wuJPI1+0tLNWQ+bWpF9FeZuSZ+df3oWI8P/yAAOrt+K cyCDcghS1SxTd9ju9rN3afbUvHvChltq3G2B48o6PWcl4yXDgIfaSzKsFMV+nTeMd60B 7pag== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/E5+2Kjvfhx/BNebQFekqC0JmLEpTEuAcdGse0RFgFTdV37ZTA kibpbm94yRnUB6++cuhkqFiEAw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:d811:0:b0:41b:3c11:32c3 with SMTP id b17-20020a63d811000000b0041b3c1132c3mr1086623pgh.183.1658854104537; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p14s (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p16-20020a170902e75000b0016b81679c1fsm11987823plf.216.2022.07.26.09.48.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:48:21 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Arnaud Pouliquen Cc: Bjorn Andersson , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Rob Herring , Christoph Hellwig , Stefano Stabellini , Bruce Ashfield Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] remoteproc: virtio: Create platform device for the remoteproc_virtio Message-ID: <20220726164821.GC15392@p14s> References: <20220713113612.2117279-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20220713113612.2117279-5-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220713113612.2117279-5-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 01:36:12PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: > Define a platform driver to manage the remoteproc virtio device as > a platform devices. > > The platform device allows to pass rproc_vdev_data platform data to > specify properties that are stored in the rproc_vdev structure. > > Such approach will allow to preserve legacy remoteproc virtio device > creation but also to probe the device using device tree mechanism. > > remoteproc_virtio.c update: > - Add rproc_virtio_driver platform driver. The probe ops replaces > the rproc_rvdev_add_device function. > - All reference to the rvdev->dev has been updated to rvdev-pdev->dev. > - rproc_rvdev_release is removed as associated to the rvdev device. > - The use of rvdev->kref counter is replaced by get/put_device on the > remoteproc virtio platform device. > - The vdev device no longer increments rproc device counter. > increment/decrement is done in rproc_virtio_probe/rproc_virtio_remove > function in charge of the vrings allocation/free. > > remoteproc_core.c update: > Migrate from the rvdev device to the rvdev platform device. > From this patch, when a vdev resource is found in the resource table > the remoteproc core register a platform device. > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen > > --- > Update vs previous revision: > - update commit message to remove reference to rproc_rvdev_remove_device. > > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 12 +- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 - > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 141 ++++++++++++----------- > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 6 +- Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier > 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > index d3eca1da8aa1..f5f2f500a50e 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > @@ -478,6 +478,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev; > struct rproc_vdev_data rvdev_data; > + struct platform_device *pdev; > > /* make sure resource isn't truncated */ > if (struct_size(rsc, vring, rsc->num_of_vrings) + rsc->config_len > > @@ -506,9 +507,12 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > rvdev_data.rsc_offset = offset; > rvdev_data.rsc = rsc; > > - rvdev = rproc_rvdev_add_device(rproc, &rvdev_data); > - if (IS_ERR(rvdev)) > - return PTR_ERR(rvdev); > + pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "rproc-virtio", rvdev_data.index, &rvdev_data, > + sizeof(rvdev_data)); > + if (IS_ERR(pdev)) { > + dev_err(dev, "failed to create rproc-virtio device\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(pdev); > + } > > return 0; > } > @@ -1244,7 +1248,7 @@ void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc) > > /* clean up remote vdev entries */ > list_for_each_entry_safe(rvdev, rvtmp, &rproc->rvdevs, node) > - kref_put(&rvdev->refcount, rproc_vdev_release); > + platform_device_unregister(rvdev->pdev); > > rproc_coredump_cleanup(rproc); > } > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > index 711b0e1f2118..bf1fb7bba1a3 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > @@ -45,9 +45,7 @@ int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, > const char **fw_name); > > /* from remoteproc_virtio.c */ > -struct rproc_vdev *rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *rvdev_data); > irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id); > -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref); > > /* from remoteproc_debugfs.c */ > void rproc_remove_trace_file(struct dentry *tfile); > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > index ccc95d4e42cf..06d2131dad11 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -46,7 +47,11 @@ static int copy_dma_range_map(struct device *to, struct device *from) > > static struct rproc_vdev *vdev_to_rvdev(struct virtio_device *vdev) > { > - return container_of(vdev->dev.parent, struct rproc_vdev, dev); > + struct platform_device *pdev; > + > + pdev = container_of(vdev->dev.parent, struct platform_device, dev); > + > + return platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > } > > static struct rproc *vdev_to_rproc(struct virtio_device *vdev) > @@ -341,13 +346,10 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev) > { > struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev); > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev); > - struct rproc *rproc = vdev_to_rproc(vdev); > > kfree(vdev); > > - kref_put(&rvdev->refcount, rproc_vdev_release); > - > - put_device(&rproc->dev); > + put_device(&rvdev->pdev->dev); > } > > /** > @@ -363,7 +365,7 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev) > static int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id) > { > struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; > - struct device *dev = &rvdev->dev; > + struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev; > struct virtio_device *vdev; > struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; > int ret; > @@ -433,18 +435,8 @@ static int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id) > vdev->dev.parent = dev; > vdev->dev.release = rproc_virtio_dev_release; > > - /* > - * We're indirectly making a non-temporary copy of the rproc pointer > - * here, because drivers probed with this vdev will indirectly > - * access the wrapping rproc. > - * > - * Therefore we must increment the rproc refcount here, and decrement > - * it _only_ when the vdev is released. > - */ > - get_device(&rproc->dev); > - > /* Reference the vdev and vring allocations */ > - kref_get(&rvdev->refcount); > + get_device(dev); > > ret = register_virtio_device(vdev); > if (ret) { > @@ -486,78 +478,57 @@ static int rproc_vdev_do_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev) > static void rproc_vdev_do_stop(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed) > { > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(subdev, struct rproc_vdev, subdev); > + struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev; > int ret; > > - ret = device_for_each_child(&rvdev->dev, NULL, rproc_remove_virtio_dev); > + ret = device_for_each_child(dev, NULL, rproc_remove_virtio_dev); > if (ret) > - dev_warn(&rvdev->dev, "can't remove vdev child device: %d\n", ret); > + dev_warn(dev, "can't remove vdev child device: %d\n", ret); > } > > -/** > - * rproc_rvdev_release() - release the existence of a rvdev > - * > - * @dev: the subdevice's dev > - */ > -static void rproc_rvdev_release(struct device *dev) > -{ > - struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(dev, struct rproc_vdev, dev); > - > - of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev); > - > - kfree(rvdev); > -} > - > -struct rproc_vdev * > -rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *rvdev_data) > +static int rproc_virtio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct rproc_vdev_data *rvdev_data = dev->platform_data; > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev; > - struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = rvdev_data->rsc; > - char name[16]; > + struct rproc *rproc = container_of(dev->parent, struct rproc, dev); > + struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc; > int i, ret; > > - rvdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*rvdev), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!rvdev) > - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + if (!rvdev_data) > + return -EINVAL; > > - kref_init(&rvdev->refcount); > + rvdev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rvdev), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!rvdev) > + return -ENOMEM; > > rvdev->id = rvdev_data->id; > rvdev->rproc = rproc; > rvdev->index = rvdev_data->index; > > - /* Initialise vdev subdevice */ > - snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index); > - rvdev->dev.parent = &rproc->dev; > - rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release; > - dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev->dev.parent), name); > - dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev); > - > - ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev); > - if (ret) { > - put_device(&rvdev->dev); > - return ERR_PTR(ret); > - } > - > - ret = copy_dma_range_map(&rvdev->dev, rproc->dev.parent); > + ret = copy_dma_range_map(dev, rproc->dev.parent); > if (ret) > - goto free_rvdev; > + return ret; > > /* Make device dma capable by inheriting from parent's capabilities */ > - set_dma_ops(&rvdev->dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent)); > + set_dma_ops(dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent)); > > - ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&rvdev->dev, > - dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent)); > + ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent)); > if (ret) { > - dev_warn(&rvdev->dev, > - "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... (%pe)\n", > + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... (%pe)\n", > dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent), ERR_PTR(ret)); > } > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rvdev); > + rvdev->pdev = pdev; > + > + rsc = rvdev_data->rsc; > + > /* parse the vrings */ > for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) { > ret = rproc_parse_vring(rvdev, rsc, i); > if (ret) > - goto free_rvdev; > + return ret; > } > > /* remember the resource offset*/ > @@ -577,21 +548,30 @@ rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *rvdev_data) > > rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev); > > - return rvdev; > + /* > + * We're indirectly making a non-temporary copy of the rproc pointer > + * here, because the platform device or the vdev device will indirectly > + * access the wrapping rproc. > + * > + * Therefore we must increment the rproc refcount here, and decrement > + * it _only_ on platform remove. > + */ > + get_device(&rproc->dev); > + > + return 0; > > unwind_vring_allocations: > for (i--; i >= 0; i--) > rproc_free_vring(&rvdev->vring[i]); > -free_rvdev: > - device_unregister(&rvdev->dev); > - return ERR_PTR(ret); > + > + return ret; > } > > -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref) > +static int rproc_virtio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > - struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(ref, struct rproc_vdev, refcount); > - struct rproc_vring *rvring; > + struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev); > struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; > + struct rproc_vring *rvring; > int id; > > for (id = 0; id < ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring); id++) { > @@ -601,5 +581,26 @@ void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref) > > rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev); > rproc_remove_rvdev(rvdev); > - device_unregister(&rvdev->dev); > + > + of_reserved_mem_device_release(&pdev->dev); > + > + put_device(&rproc->dev); > + > + return 0; > } > + > +/* Platform driver */ > +static const struct of_device_id rproc_virtio_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "virtio,rproc", }, > + {}, > +}; > + > +static struct platform_driver rproc_virtio_driver = { > + .probe = rproc_virtio_probe, > + .remove = rproc_virtio_remove, > + .driver = { > + .name = "rproc-virtio", > + .of_match_table = rproc_virtio_match, > + }, > +}; > +builtin_platform_driver(rproc_virtio_driver); > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > index 7c943f0a2fc4..64b9809d0ec1 100644 > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > @@ -616,9 +616,8 @@ struct rproc_vring { > > /** > * struct rproc_vdev - remoteproc state for a supported virtio device > - * @refcount: reference counter for the vdev and vring allocations > * @subdev: handle for registering the vdev as a rproc subdevice > - * @dev: device struct used for reference count semantics > + * @pdev: remoteproc virtio platform device > * @id: virtio device id (as in virtio_ids.h) > * @node: list node > * @rproc: the rproc handle > @@ -627,10 +626,9 @@ struct rproc_vring { > * @index: vdev position versus other vdev declared in resource table > */ > struct rproc_vdev { > - struct kref refcount; > > struct rproc_subdev subdev; > - struct device dev; > + struct platform_device *pdev; > > unsigned int id; > struct list_head node; > -- > 2.24.3 >