Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Conor Dooley <mail@conchuod.ie>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
        Atul Khare <atulkhare@rivosinc.com>,
        Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix SiFive dt-schema errors
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 18:07:24 +0100
Message-Id: <20220726170725.3245278-1-mail@conchuod.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Hi all,
As these are the last remaining dtbs_check warnings for the default
riscv defconfig I am reviving the series. Atul has been hit by some
hardware issues so has not had a chance to send an applicable version
of these patches. All I have done here is rebase on linux-next, so by
the time the merge window reopens it will hopefully apply..

On Atul's V2, Rob had a comment about changing the cache-sets in the
patch 1/2:
There is not any way to express power of 2, so you have to list values.
Rather than just adding 1 more value, I would add at least a few more so
we're not adding these one by one. This is for a specific cache
implementation, so it can't really be *any* power of 2. Designs have
some limits or physics does. /endquote

I don't think that there's value in speculatively adding values to this
enum especially as (I think at least) the scala for this cache IP has
been released publicly:
https://github.com/sifive/block-inclusivecache-sifive/blob/master/design/craft/inclusivecache/src/Parameters.scala#L32

The two compatibles in the file match only against two specific cache
implemenations: the fu540's & the fu740's. I would seem to me that, it
would be better to lock this to a single value per compatible since the
1024 applies to the fu540 & the new value of 2048 applies only to the
fu740.

I have not made that change, I simply wanted to repackage this series
in a way that could be more easily applied & restart the discussion.

Thanks,
Conor.

Atul Khare (2):
  dt-bindings: sifive: add cache-set value of 2048
  dt-bindings: sifive: add gpio-line-names

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/sifive,gpio.yaml      | 4 ++++
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


base-commit: 058affafc65a74cf54499fb578b66ad0b18f939b
-- 
2.37.1