Received: by 2002:ac0:e34a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g10csp950764imn; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:00:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sK1V/pTmvLCTRW2JKz8fgi5U0et2isNx136s73zC8xLKNuvuC/v1P4kghtMzamH81fF4Nw X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:b7b:b0:43c:90c0:86cc with SMTP id cb27-20020a0564020b7b00b0043c90c086ccmr2224293edb.247.1658869259760; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:00:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1658869259; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=x4cb3MYEpKjKUa40kpRz1gC87VrQ9ee9kgbmI/Yq/bD2bLlvw9riP2AH/gZmv77XMi 2twcRAH5N3JDjAfI8CNTRQXN24kX+2zOVQ2Zb9djUJs3AXp3jsuW7qOEHguJix0I6jkM Z03gFCXL8pOC2fiK/9KPUeaVMYPVDRo0IMYslHm137EBL4NjlnMHC8aUKHLyEvkALxlW q7+0gxqRd66NjT3Dt7fwLe5wxBgSRjsHYK7Hjh74KDjOJRnQiEtARGM4al8gFOpUnQO2 fyB2+DUsJdA2L2t6qom6ZNBu4Si8k+PoPJloYIU113RLij0Xa85QLf0IFVbUpT7vUHX2 kcBA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:mail-followup-to:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=mCeYiM98qk7/jdAtlpy7MJlNkO1AbBgsrKc1/3FMchM=; b=NwwDd/vz61SWz6xwYw8f0Sq8HkSEtG2AIncEtSmluDK+PqdcEH+amSwAKfYRfOUzvK IeqYJz/Y9U++hgl0KaGGE5IQtvTwyXY88pq0i9aBOWhhj+wlriN4EBndgTlv9/2OaSpF 2tVxNvP4OqLfKny2gxBoIBqQ1EBVACFPJJmioZ3pMgJe8RL5cXupItpN42BAj+bRkXfM kHfjvPRw/8aW5MZdx3vlQ825gUxHc3dpDMM5516rOsdHZFXmJhd+rJ9K4Cvz2fubS4BB yKbFdP9REvoVZm0+rycjP7qJbqebdpZ0Z/PyIsUmyyNobJgs/4DeL8HGWhD3d7cswbGN 2F8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=IMTvg6jc; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=0zA8p2rn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y13-20020a056402270d00b0043c375f06fdsi4422225edd.252.2022.07.26.14.00.34; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=IMTvg6jc; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=0zA8p2rn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239207AbiGZUrm (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:47:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43586 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229662AbiGZUrl (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:47:41 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3555E19015; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:47:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A921FEBF; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:47:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1658868457; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mCeYiM98qk7/jdAtlpy7MJlNkO1AbBgsrKc1/3FMchM=; b=IMTvg6jcK1KStNU/fBNfruGXCGwQXHRiN8KYjKphqFuVD+Q6dgsTGJgttO9K9bvhRWaEBu vXhzSsvlH8eB7Dg12XyNXTDwhEiXbNX1X4cXiAngUAeXeSqssFm9aDG9R+bfGaV7ztEPiV QmOzlBPHCgrEa0tlEbnB+FStZAYBCCE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1658868457; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mCeYiM98qk7/jdAtlpy7MJlNkO1AbBgsrKc1/3FMchM=; b=0zA8p2rnCZzUJPgvYWQZ9svxtqJk1Ko6a8BmcYe1oXvlNcbr7sOvaiGsL+nspUXnY//mHq /hFc7qOdK6eOzkDQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0BC613A7C; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id IRclKulS4GKqSAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:47:37 +0000 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 22:42:40 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Chris Murphy Cc: David Sterba , =?utf-8?B?0JzQuNGF0LDQuNC7INCT0LDQstGA0LjQu9C+0LI=?= , Btrfs BTRFS , linux-kernel Subject: Re: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low! Message-ID: <20220726204240.GM13489@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Chris Murphy , =?utf-8?B?0JzQuNGF0LDQuNC7INCT0LDQstGA0LjQu9C+0LI=?= , Btrfs BTRFS , linux-kernel References: <20220726164250.GE13489@twin.jikos.cz> <92e9ca9b-f458-409f-a9c4-150f6bce0b75@www.fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <92e9ca9b-f458-409f-a9c4-150f6bce0b75@www.fastmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 03:21:32PM -0400, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 3:19 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 12:42 PM, David Sterba wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 05:32:54PM +0500, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: > >>> Hi guys. > >>> Always with intensive writing on a btrfs volume, the message "BUG: > >>> MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!" appears in the kernel logs. > >> > >> Increase the config value of LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS, default is 16, 18 > >> tends to work. > > > > Fedora is using 17. I'll make a request to bump it to 18. Thanks. > > Should it be 18 across all archs? Or is it OK to only bump x86_64? I think it applies to all achritectures equally but I'm no lockdep expert.