Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <dc737abb-041b-491a-14f1-a584f9e64a3d@quicinc.com>
References: <YrxtXdOsIZ5LKhdV@google.com> <de1f3f33-0a8c-eb87-694c-16ebf2835720@quicinc.com>
 <Yr6oLlmfWRkiAZG7@google.com> <52c6ab15-1cd8-324e-4bcc-c449d8bceb19@quicinc.com>
 <Yr66ZZqEnBApHYMA@google.com> <0481d3cc-4bb9-4969-0232-76ba57ff260d@quicinc.com>
 <YsLhxx+L3+GJDRyO@google.com> <bcc5f059-b991-296a-bba6-9cb1236097f2@quicinc.com>
 <Ys1tYAO39LKzEAOE@google.com> <dc737abb-041b-491a-14f1-a584f9e64a3d@quicinc.com>
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
User-Agent: alot/0.10
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:19:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAE-0n528QaTtZFp=WAaHShegFRpKVN_67jQfUJTtsRPr6s--zA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 6/9] mfd: pm8008: Use i2c_new_dummy_device() API
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_c_skakit@quicinc.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_collinsd@quicinc.com,
        quic_subbaram@quicinc.com, quic_jprakash@quicinc.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) (2022-07-21 23:31:16)
>
>  =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 regulator-name =
=3D "pm8008_l6";
>  =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 };
>
>  =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 pm8008_l7: ldo7@4600 {
>  =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 reg =3D <0x4600=
>;
>  =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 regulator-name =
=3D "pm8008_l7";
>  =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 };
>  =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0};
> };
>
>
> Stephen/Mark, Please do let me know if you are OK with this design.
>

I was happy with the previous version of the DT node. That had one node
for the "pm8008 chip", which is important because it really is one
package. Why isn't that possible to implement and also register i2c
devices on the i2c bus for the second address?