Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 27 Jul 2022 14:46:14 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To:     Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] hugetlbfs: fix inaccurate comment in
 hugetlbfs_statfs()
Message-ID: <YuDfNvaNsB0pvvww@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net>
References: <20220726142918.51693-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
 <20220726142918.51693-6-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220726142918.51693-6-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:29:18PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> In some cases, e.g. when size option is not specified, f_blocks, f_bavail
> and f_bfree will be set to -1 instead of 0. Likewise, when nr_inodes isn't
> specified, f_files and f_ffree will be set to -1 too. Update the comment
> to make this clear.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>

Thanks.