Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932709AbXFEO4m (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:56:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932679AbXFEO4H (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:56:07 -0400 Received: from havoc.gtf.org ([69.61.125.42]:42625 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932643AbXFEO4F (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:56:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:56:03 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik To: Russell King , Alan Cox , Christoph Hellwig , David Miller , mroos@linux.ee, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: libata & no PCI: dma_[un]map_single undefined Message-ID: <20070605145603.GF31565@havoc.gtf.org> References: <20070603.174010.41894721.davem@davemloft.net> <20070604074719.GB15390@infradead.org> <20070604171952.GA3437@dhcp83-182.boston.redhat.com> <20070605122218.410d611b@the-village.bc.nu> <20070605135608.GA31565@havoc.gtf.org> <20070605141714.GA2572@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070605143523.GE31565@havoc.gtf.org> <20070605145149.GB2572@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070605145149.GB2572@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1419 Lines: 36 On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:51:49PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:35:23AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > BTW, please fix your mailer. It emits Mail-Followup-To headers that > > hijack everyone on the thread into the To field, breaking the normal > > LKML To/CC standard replying mechanism that has been working for a > > decade. > > Sorry, I will not. My local policy (which I have the utmost right to > have) is that I do not wish to be CC'd on responses to replies to my > posts. Additional useless CC's are a waste of my limited bandwidth > and resources. > > It's a question of local policy required by local resource limitations. > > So I give you a choice: you can either have the benefit of me reply and > put up with the follow up header, or I will arrange to never reply to > your messages ever again (which may involve me never reading one again). > Which would you prefer? Your personal preference is fine with me. Just stop hijacking -everyone else's- preferences along with it. A far more community-friendly method that operates within existing email standards is to filter out duplicate message ids on your side. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/