Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932962AbXFEPAh (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:00:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932767AbXFEO75 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:59:57 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([217.147.92.249]:4293 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932680AbXFEO74 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:59:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:59:46 +0100 From: Russell King To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Alan Cox , Christoph Hellwig , David Miller , mroos@linux.ee, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: libata & no PCI: dma_[un]map_single undefined Message-ID: <20070605145945.GC2572@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Jeff Garzik , Alan Cox , Christoph Hellwig , David Miller , mroos@linux.ee, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070603.174010.41894721.davem@davemloft.net> <20070604074719.GB15390@infradead.org> <20070604171952.GA3437@dhcp83-182.boston.redhat.com> <20070605122218.410d611b@the-village.bc.nu> <20070605135608.GA31565@havoc.gtf.org> <20070605141714.GA2572@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070605143523.GE31565@havoc.gtf.org> <20070605145149.GB2572@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070605145603.GF31565@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070605145603.GF31565@havoc.gtf.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2144 Lines: 49 On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:56:03AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:51:49PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:35:23AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > > > BTW, please fix your mailer. It emits Mail-Followup-To headers that > > > hijack everyone on the thread into the To field, breaking the normal > > > LKML To/CC standard replying mechanism that has been working for a > > > decade. > > > > Sorry, I will not. My local policy (which I have the utmost right to > > have) is that I do not wish to be CC'd on responses to replies to my > > posts. Additional useless CC's are a waste of my limited bandwidth > > and resources. > > > > It's a question of local policy required by local resource limitations. > > > > So I give you a choice: you can either have the benefit of me reply and > > put up with the follow up header, or I will arrange to never reply to > > your messages ever again (which may involve me never reading one again). > > Which would you prefer? > > Your personal preference is fine with me. > > Just stop hijacking -everyone else's- preferences along with it. > > A far more community-friendly method that operates within existing email > standards is to filter out duplicate message ids on your side. Utterly wrong - you didn't understand the problem. Please take the time to read my email. It's the fact that I _am_ CC'd on replies, so I get one message from LKML one from the original poster, maybe one via another mailing list if it's also copied there. Add that in to the mix of all the other mail hitting my MTA and the probability for the machine to exhaust it's limited VM is very high. Give me a way to stop people CC'ing me on replies and I'll happily remove the header. Unfortunately there isn't, so I can't. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/