Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <9f32a4a9-66b4-ba2e-1713-436103c2faf8@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:44:52 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: riscv: Add DT binding documentation for
 Renesas RZ/Five SoC and SMARC EVK
Content-Language: en-US
To:     "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
References: <20220726180623.1668-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <20220726180623.1668-5-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <636e9214-4b36-e9a6-3c6b-b6edb944335e@linaro.org>
 <CA+V-a8sTw1qzuTeD2vb7RgDmmNdEP5qEcxXCjrFgkyrBrLrt5Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <e64cc15e-b31e-876d-b3cf-b60d255c495b@linaro.org>
 <CA+V-a8u1VW9xaj2KjySyMuegpisLVENO_6uJOpAFZGbKziYLYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <e31e0c1f-4755-704e-8428-93970877d8f5@linaro.org>
 <CA+V-a8sX=Frs_cds9MriauTFRvcZUNCvoeZ+SaC0GUpL7L6qhg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8sX=Frs_cds9MriauTFRvcZUNCvoeZ+SaC0GUpL7L6qhg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 27/07/2022 13:37, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
>>>>
>>> I did run the dtbs_check test as per your suggestion (below is the
>>> log) and didn't see "no matching schema error"
>>>
>>
>> So you do not see any errors at all. Then it does not work, does it?
>>
> Right I reverted my changes I can see it complaining, dtb_check seems
> to have returned false positive in my case.
> 
> What approach would you suggest to ignore the schema here?

I don't think currently it would work with your approach. Instead, you
should select here all SoCs which the schema should match.

This leads to my previous concern - you use the same SoC compatible for
two different architectures and different SoCs: ARMv8 and RISC-V.

Best regards,
Krzysztof