Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <19e25833-5f5c-f9b9-ac0f-1945ea17638d@sberdevices.ru>
 <355f4bb6-82e7-2400-83e9-c704a7ef92f3@sberdevices.ru> <20220727122241.mrafnepbelcboo5i@sgarzare-redhat>
In-Reply-To: <20220727122241.mrafnepbelcboo5i@sgarzare-redhat>
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jul 2022 14:29:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGxU2F7uw8fo4bn7t+3L2-irvxtCY+KchzPSXayimZZjdM1sdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/9] vmci/vsock: use 'target' in notify_poll_in, callback
To:     Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>,
        Bryan Tan <bryantan@vmware.com>,
        Rajesh Jalisatgi <rjalisatgi@vmware.com>,
        Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@vmware.com>,
        VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@vmware.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        "kys@microsoft.com" <kys@microsoft.com>,
        "haiyangz@microsoft.com" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        "sthemmin@microsoft.com" <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        "wei.liu@kernel.org" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@gmail.com>,
        "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@sberdevices.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 2:22 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> @Jorgen can you take a look at this series, especially this patch?

Jorgen's email bounced back, so I'm CCing VMCI maintainers.

Bryan, Rajesh, Vishnu, can you take a look?

Thanks,
Stefano

>
> Maybe we need to update the comments in the else branch, something like
> s/there is nothing/there is not enough data
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 08:01:01AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> >This callback controls setting of POLLIN,POLLRDNORM output bits of poll()
> >syscall,but in some cases,it is incorrectly to set it, when socket has
> >at least 1 bytes of available data. Use 'target' which is already exists
> >and equal to sk_rcvlowat in this case.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
> >---
> > net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c        | 2 +-
> > net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c
> >index d69fc4b595ad..1684b85b0660 100644
> >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c
> >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c
> >@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ vmci_transport_notify_pkt_poll_in(struct sock *sk,
> > {
> >       struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> >
> >-      if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk)) {
> >+      if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) >= target) {
> >               *data_ready_now = true;
> >       } else {
> >               /* We can't read right now because there is nothing in the
> >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c
> >index 0f36d7c45db3..a40407872b53 100644
> >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c
> >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c
> >@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ vmci_transport_notify_pkt_poll_in(struct sock *sk,
> > {
> >       struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> >
> >-      if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk)) {
> >+      if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) >= target) {
> >               *data_ready_now = true;
> >       } else {
> >               /* We can't read right now because there is nothing in the
> >--
> >2.25.1